谦虚、渴望、脚踏实地、一步步地学习,这样就可以避免成为浮躁、贪婪的你。

如何做好科学研究的黄金定律

上一篇 / 下一篇  2010-08-01 10:09:58 / 个人分类:科研江湖

文章来源
  • 文章来源:转载

  做研究的人大多都会关注这个问题。

  在网上读某个专业人士的博客时,看到了他给出的关于科学研究黄金定律的相关解释和原文连接。我下载了原文看看,抄一部分过来。这个黄金定律的提出者似乎已经过世,但据他说这些黄金定律受到了很多人的肯定,有广泛的共识。

  第一定律,属于内部范畴(从自身出发与外界无关的),那就是:提高自己能力标准到最高,不做常规的事(不走寻常路)。

  第二定律,属于外部范畴(与外界事务相关),那就是:如果在社会认可度和学术意义两者间进行选择的话,那么,请选择后者。当然,如果两者不冲突更好。

  第三定律,属于内外兼具的范畴(关系到你和你的同行),那就是:不要去那些那些你能做好,而你的同行也能做得和你一样好的问题。       分析化学  仪器分析  红外光谱

  目前,我还在理解和体会这三条定律。不知道各位看客有何感想?

  附原文:

  The Three Golden Rules for Successful Scientific Research.

  This note is devoted to three rules, the following of which is necessary if you want to be successful in scientific research. (If you manage to follow them, they will prove close to sufficient, but that is another story.) They are recorded for the benefit of those who would like to be successful in their scientific research, but fail to be so because, being unaware of these rules, they violate them. In order to avoid any misunderstanding I would like to stress, right in its first paragraph, that this note is purely pragmatic: no moral judgments are implied, and it is completely up to you to decide whether you wish to regard trying to be successful in scientific research as a noble goal in life or not. I even leave you the option of not making that decision at all.

  The first rule is an "internal" one: it has nothing to do with your relation with others, it concerns you yourself in isolation. It is as follows:

  "Raise your quality standards as high as you can live with, avoid wasting your time on routine problems, and always try to work as closely as possible at the boundary of your abilities. Do this, because it is the only way of discovering how that boundary should be moved forward."

  This rule tells us that the obviously possible should be shunned as well as the obviously impossible: the first would not be instructive, the second would be hopeless, and both in their own way are barren.

  The second rule is an "external" one: it deals with the relation between "the scientific world" and "the real world". It is as follows:

  "We all like our work to be socially relevant and scientifically sound. If we can find a topic satisfying both desires, we are lucky; if the two targets are in conflict with each other, let the requirement of scientific soundness prevail."

  The reason for this rule is obvious. If you do a piece of "perfect" work in which no one is interested, no harm is done, on the contrary: at least something "perfect"—be it irrelevant—has been added to our culture. If, however, you offer a shaky, would-be solution to an urgent problem, you do indeed harm to the world which, in view of the urgency of the problem, will only be too willing to apply your ineffective remedy. It is no wonder that charlatanry always flourishes in connection with incurable diseases. (Our second rule is traditionally violated by social sciences to such an extent that one can now question if they deserve the name "sciences" at all.)

  The third rule is on the scale "internal/external" somewhere in between: it deals with the relation between you and your scientific colleagues. it is as follows:

  "Never tackle a problem of which you can be pretty sure that (now or in the near future) it will be tackled by others who are, in relation to that problem, at least as competent and well-equipped as you."

  Again the reason is obvious. If others will come up with as good a solution as you could obtain, the world doesn't loose a thing if you leave the problem alone. A corollary of the third rule is that one should never compete with one's colleagues. If you are pretty sure that in a certain area you will do a better job than anyone else, please do it in complete devotion, but when in doubt, abstain. The third rule ensures that your contributions --if any!-- will be unique.

  I have check the Three Golden Rules with a number of my colleagues from very different parts of the world, living and working under very different circumstances. They all agreed. And were not shocked either. The rules may strike you as a bit cruel... If so, they should, for the sooner you have discovered that the scientific world is not a soft place but --like most other worlds, for that matter-- a fairly ruthless one, the better. My blessings are with you.

  Plataanstraat 5

  5671 AL NUENEN

  The Netherlands

  prof.dr. Edsger W. Dijkstra

  Burroughs Research Fellow


TAG: 科学研究 黄金定律

 

评分:0

我来说两句

显示全部

:loveliness: :handshake :victory: :funk: :time: :kiss: :call: :hug: :lol :'( :Q :L ;P :$ :P :o :@ :D :( :)

Open Toolbar