03.120.20 (Product and company certification. Conf 标准查询与下载

ASTM D6300-04 石油产品和润滑油试验方法中使用的精密度和偏差数据测定的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice covers the necessary preparations and planning for the conduct of interlaboratory programs for the development of estimates of precision (determinability, repeatability, and reproducibility) and of bias (absolute and relative), and further presents the standard phraseology for incorporating such information into standard test methods.1.2 This practice is generally limited to homogeneous products with which serious sampling problems do not normally arise.1.3 This practice may not be suitable for solid or semisolid products such as petroleum coke, industrial pitches, paraffin waxes, greases, or solid lubricants when the heterogeneous properties of the substances create sampling problems. In such instances, use Practice E 691 or consult a trained statistician.1.4 A software program (ADJD6300) performs the necessary computations prescribed by this practice.

Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias Data for Use in Test Methods for Petroleum Products and Lubricants

ASTM E1212-04(2008) 无损检验机构质量控制体系的建立和维护

This practice covers procedures for establishing and maintaining a quality system for nondestructive testing agencies. Controlling the quality of service rendered is a continuing process. This practice provides guidelines for establishing a quality management system that provides for: calibration, standardization, reference samples, examination plans, and procedures. The basic requirements for a quality management system encompass the following areas, all of which shall be documented. Quality policy statement, planning, and administration, Organization, Human resources, Physical resources, and Quality management.1.1 This practice covers general requirements for the establishment and maintenance of a quality management system for agencies engaged in nondestructive testing (NDT). 1.2 This practice utilizes criteria contained in Practice E 543. 1.3 This practice utilizes criteria contained in American National Standard ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001–2000, Quality management systems—Requirements. 1.4 This practice recognizes the importance of establishing minimum safety criteria. 1.5 This practice does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this practice to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Quality Management Systems for Nondestructive Testing Agencies

ASTM D6512-03 实验室间数值预测的标准规程

1.1 This practice establishes a uniform standard for computing the interlaboratory quantitation estimate associated with Z % relative standard deviation (referred to herein as IQEZ %), and provides guidance concerning the appropriate use and application.1.2 IQEZ % is computed to be the lowest concentration for which a single measurement from a laboratory selected from the population of qualified laboratories represented in an interlaboratory study will have an estimated Z % relative standard deviation (Z % RSD, based on interlaboratory standard deviation), where Z is typically an integer multiple of 10, such as 10, 20, or 30, but Z can be less than 10. The IQE10 % is consistent with the quantitation approaches of Currie (1) and Oppenheimer, et al (2).1.3 The fundamental assumption of the collaborative study is that the media tested, the concentrations tested, and the protocol followed in the study provide a representative and fair evaluation of the scope and applicability of the test method as written. Properly applied, the IQE procedure ensures that the IQE has the following properties:1.3.1 Routinely Achievable IQE Value8212;Most laboratories are able to attain the IQE quantitation performance in routine analyses, using a standard measurement system, at reasonable cost. This property is needed for a quantitation limit to be feasible in practical situations. Representative laboratories must be included in the data to calculate the IQE.1.3.2 Accounting for Routine Sources of Error8212;The IQE should realistically include sources of bias and variation that are common to the measurement process. These sources include, but are not limited to: intrinsic instrument noise, some "typical" amount of carryover error; plus differences in laboratories, analysts, sample preparation, and instruments.1.3.3 Avoidable Sources of Error Excluded8212;The IQE should realistically exclude avoidable sources of bias and variation; that is, those sources that can reasonably be avoided in routine field measurements. Avoidable sources would include, but are not limited to: modifications to the sample; modifications to the measurement procedure; modifications to the measurement equipment of the validated method, and gross and easily discernible transcription errors, provided there was a way to detect and either correct or eliminate them.1.4 The IQE applies to measurement methods for which calibration error is minor relative to other sources, such as when the dominant source of variation is one of the following:1.4.1 Sample Preparationand calibration standards do not have to go through sample preparation.1.4.2 Differences in Analystsand analysts have little opportunity to affect calibration results (as is the case with automated calibration).1.4.3 Differences in Laboratories(for whatever reasons), perhaps difficult to identify and eliminate.1.4.4 Differences in Instruments(measurement equipment), such as differences in manufacturer, model, hardware, electronics, sampling rate, chemical processing rate, integration time, software algorithms, internal signal processing and thresholds, effective sample volume, and contamination level.1.5 Data Quality Objectives8212;Typically, one would compute the lowest % RSD possible for any given dataset for a particular method. Thus, if possible, IQE10 % would be computed. If the data indicated that the method was too noisy, one might have to compute instead IQE20 %, or possibly IQE 30 %. In any case, an IQE with a higher % RSD level (such as IQE50 %) would not be considered, though an IQE with RSD 10 % (such as IQE1 %) would be acceptable. The appropriate level of % RSD may depend on the intended use of the IQE.

Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Quantitation Estimate

ASTM D3740-03 工程设计及建筑中使用的土壤和岩石的试验和或检查中使用试剂评定的规程

1.1 This practice establishes minimum qualifications for agencies engaged in the testing and inspection of soil and rock. Minimum requirements for field and laboratory personnel are defined. The practice also covers the establishment and maintenance of a quality system. 1.2 Criteria are provided for evaluating the capability of an agency to properly perform designated tests on soil and rock, and for establishing essential characteristics pertaining to an agency''s organization, personnel, facilities, and quality system. This practice may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements for particular projects.1.3 This practice can be used as a basis to evaluate testing and inspection agencies, or both, and is intended for use for the qualifying or accrediting, or both, of testing or inspection agencies, public or private, engaged in the testing and inspection of soil and rock as used in engineering design and construction.1.4 This practice is applicable to all standards promulgated by Committee D18 whether or not mentioned in the Referenced Document Section.1.5 This practice is not intended to apply to agencies engaged in chemical testing of soil, rock, and contained fluid. The minimum requirement for those agencies can be found in Specification D 5522.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.7 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project''s many unique aspects. The word "Standard" in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.

Standard Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in Engineering Design and Construction

ASTM D6300-03 石油产品和润滑油试验方法中使用的精确度和偏差数据测定的标准实施规范

1.1 This practice covers the necessary preparations and planning for the conduct of interlaboratory programs for the development of estimates of precision (determinability, repeatability, and reproducibility) and of bias (absolute and relative), and further presents the standard phraseology for incorporating such information into standard test methods.1.2 This practice is generally limited to homogeneous products with which serious sampling problems do not normally arise.1.3 This practice may not be suitable for solid or semisolid products such as petroleum coke, industrial pitches, paraffin waxes, greases, or solid lubricants when the heterogeneous properties of the substances create sampling problems. In such instances, use Practice E 691 or consult a trained statistician.1.4 A software program (ADJD6300) performs the necessary computations prescribed by this practice.

Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias Data for Use in Test Methods for Petroleum Products and Lubricants

ASTM E1359-02 检查无损检验机构能力的标准指南

1.1 This guide establishes areas for review and provides a survey form that can be used in determining the competence of a nondestructive testing agency.1.1.1 Criteria from Practices E 543, E 1212, and ASNT SNT-TC-1A, ANSI/ASNT CP-189, and ACCP-Rev. 1, were used in the preparation of this guide.1.2 Areas for review should include, but are not limited to, the following: description of the agency, its facilities and organization; documentation of policies or practices, or both, including a) contract review, b) equipment calibration, and c) personnel qualifications.

Standard Guide for Evaluating Capabilities of Nondestructive Testing Agencies

ASTM E2212-02 卫生管理认证书政策的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice covers a policy ("the policy") for digital certificates that support the authentication, authorization, confidentiality, integrity, and nonrepudiation requirements of persons and organizations that electronically create, disclose, receive, or otherwise transact health information.1.2 This practice defines a policy for three classes of certificates: (1) entity certificates issued to computing components such as servers, devices, applications, processes, or accounts reflecting role assignment; (2) basic individual certificates issued to natural persons involved in the exchange of health information used for healthcare provisioning; and (3) clinical individual certificates issued to natural persons and used for authentication of prescriptive orders relating to the clinical treatment of patients.1.3 The policy defined by this practice covers: (1) definition of healthcare certificates, healthcare certification authorities, healthcare subscribers, and healthcare relying parties; (2) appropriate use of healthcare certificates; ( 3) general conditions for the issuance of healthcare certificates; (4) healthcare certificate formats and profile; and (5) requirements for the protection of key material.1.4 The policy establishes minimum responsibilities for healthcare certification authorities, relying parties, and certificate subscribers.

Standard Practice for Healthcare Certificate Policy

ASTM D6300-02 用于石油产品和润滑油的试验方法中的精密性和偏差数据测定的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice covers the necessary preparations and planning for the conduct of interlaboratory programs for the development of estimates of precision (determinability, repeatability, and reproducibility) and of bias (absolute and relative), and further presents the standard phraseology for incorporating such information into standard test methods.1.2 This practice is generally limited to homogeneous products with which serious sampling problems do not normally arise.1.3 This practice may not be suitable for solid or semisolid products such as petroleum coke, industrial pitches, paraffin waxes, greases, or solid lubricants when the heterogeneous properties of the substances create sampling problems. In such instances, use Practice E 691 or consult a trained statistician.

Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias Data for Use in Test Methods for Petroleum Products and Lubricants

ASTM E2212-02a 卫生管理认证书政策的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice covers a policy ("the policy") for digital certificates that support the authentication, authorization, confidentiality, integrity, and nonrepudiation requirements of persons and organizations that electronically create, disclose, receive, or otherwise transact health information.1.2 This practice defines a policy for three classes of certificates: (1) entity certificates issued to computing components such as servers, devices, applications, processes, or accounts reflecting role assignment; (2) basic individual certificates issued to natural persons involved in the exchange of health information used for healthcare provisioning; and (3) clinical individual certificates issued to natural persons and used for authentication of prescriptive orders relating to the clinical treatment of patients.1.3 The policy defined by this practice covers: (1) definition of healthcare certificates, healthcare certification authorities, healthcare subscribers, and healthcare relying parties; (2) appropriate use of healthcare certificates; ( 3) general conditions for the issuance of healthcare certificates; (4) healthcare certificate formats and profile; and (5) requirements for the protection of key material.1.4 The policy establishes minimum responsibilities for healthcare certification authorities, relying parties, and certificate subscribers.

Standard Practice for Healthcare Certificate Policy

ASTM E1359-02(2008) 检查无损检验机构

The use of this survey form will provide the auditor with a guide for evaluating an agency. 3.1.1 The description of the agencyrsquo;facility and its organization will aid the auditor in determining if the agency has adequate capacity and capability to fulfill the contractual requirement. 3.1.2 A review of the agencyrsquo;policies and/or practices will aid the auditor in determining if the agency has adequate controls on its system. 3.1.3 A review of the agencyrsquo;records will aid the auditor in determining if the facility complies with its own written policies or practices, or both. The recommendations set forth in this guide are minimums and should be supplemented by the user, as necessary, to meet the specific requirements of the contract. The use of this survey form provides the auditor with a permanent record and includes a corrective action request.1.1 This guide establishes areas for review and provides a survey form that can be used in determining the competence of a nondestructive testing agency. 1.1.1 Criteria from Practices E 543, E 1212, and ASNT SNT-TC-1A, ANSI/ASNT CP-189, and ACCP-Rev. 1, were used in the preparation of this guide. 1.2 Areas for review should include, but are not limited to, the following: description of the agency, its facilities and organization; documentation of policies or practices, or both, including a) contract review, b) equipment calibration, and c) personnel qualifications.

Standard Guide for Evaluating Capabilities of Nondestructive Testing Agencies

ASTM D6689-01(2006) 同样试验组织内多层工作台最优控制和报告试验方法不确定性的标准指南

1.1 This guide describes a protocol for optimizing, controlling, and reporting test method uncertainties from multiple workstations in the same laboratory organization. It does not apply when different test methods, dissimilar instruments, or different parts of the same laboratory organization function independently to validate or verify the accuracy of a specific analytical measurement.This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use.

Standard Guide for Optimizing, Controlling and Reporting Test Method Uncertainties from Multiple Workstations in the Same Laboratory Organization

ASTM D3740-01 工程设计及建筑中使用的土壤和岩石的试验和或检查中使用试剂评定的规程

1.1 This practice establishes minimum qualifications for agencies engaged in the testing and inspection of soil and rock. Minimum requirements for field and laboratory personnel are defined. The practice also covers the establishment and maintenance of a quality system. 1.2 Criteria are provided for evaluating the capability of an agency to properly perform designated tests on soil and rock, and for establishing essential characteristics pertaining to an agency''s organization, personnel, facilities, and quality system. This practice may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements for particular projects.1.3 This practice can be used as a basis to evaluate testing and inspection agencies, or both, and is intended for use for the qualifying or accrediting, or both, of testing or inspection agencies, public or private, engaged in the testing and inspection of soil and rock as used in engineering design and construction.1.4 This practice is not intended to apply to agencies engaged in chemical testing of soil, rock, and contained fluid. The minimum requirement for those agencies can be found in Specification D5522.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.6 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project''s many unique aspects. The word "Standard" in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.

Standard Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in Engineering Design and Construction

ASTM E541-01 从事建成楼房的系统分析和合格保证的机构的标准规范

1.1 This standard was initiated to meet the needs of regulatory programs for the certification of manufactured building. The various statutes differ somewhat in the responsibilities assigned to the administrative agency responsible for implementing the rules and regulations for manufactured building. The administrative agency may utilize the services and facilities of building-evaluation agencies in carrying out its responsibilities for evaluating manufactured building systems. By providing criteria for evaluating these agencies, this standard''s objective is to (1) utilize the voluntary standards system to provide a common base for the various regulatory approaches employed by the authorities having jurisdiction, and (2) make provision for varying degrees of optional technical support for the certification of manufactured building.1.2 To establish an appropriate degree of intra- and inter-state credibility regarding building system evaluations made through governmental or private agencies, the authorities having jurisdiction may wish to utilize an accreditation program for such agencies.1.3 Building-evaluation organizations examined under this standard may include both governmental and private agencies qualified to act on behalf of the public as designee agents (that is, agencies) of the government office having jurisdiction.1.4 This standard covers criteria by which the technical resources of agencies, both governmental and private, may be evaluated for their capability to perform the system analysis or compliance assurance function, or combination thereof, in the evaluation and inspection (certification) of manufactured building. Practice E 651 may be used for the evaluation of such agencies.1.5 These criteria set forth the minimum personnel requirements and the technical and organizational procedures required for agencies engaged in evaluating manufactured building. Other criteria such as independence, financial stability, and objectivity may need to be considered.1.6 Criteria are included for agencies evaluating innovative as well as conventional building systems, against applicable requirements.1.7 Agencies involved in testing, quality assurance and evaluating building components can be evaluated by using Practice E 691.1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in System Analysis and Compliance Assurance for Manufactured Building

ASTM D6689-01(2011) 来自同一实验室机构中多个工作站的试验方法不确定度的优选,控制和报告的标准指南

Many analytical laboratories comply with accepted quality system requirements such as NELAC chapter 5 (see Note 2) and ISO 17025. When using standard test methods, their test results on the same sample should agree with those from other similar laboratories within the reproducibility estimates (R2) published in the standard. Reproducibility estimates are generated during the standardization process as part of the interlaboratory studies (ILS). Many laboratories participate in proficiency tests to confirm that they perform consistently over time. In both ILS and proficiency testing protocols, it is generally assumed that only one workstation is used to generate the data (see 6.5.1). Note 28212;NELAC chapter 5 allows the use of a Work Cell where multiple instruments/operators are treated as one unit: the performance of the Work Cell is tracked rather than each workstation independently. This guide is intended to go beyond the Work Cell to achieve the benefits of monitoring workstations independently. Many laboratories have workloads and/or logistical requirements that dictate the use of multiple workstations. Some have multiple stations in the same area (central laboratory format). Others'' stations are scattered throughout a facility (at-line laboratory format). Often, analysis reports do not identify the workstation used for the testing, even if workstations differ in their testing uncertainties. Problems can arise if clients mistakenly attribute variation in report values to process rather then workstation variability. These problems can be minimized if the laboratory organization sets, complies with, and reports a unified set of measurement quality objectives throughout. This guide can be used to harmonize calibration and control protocols for all workstations, thereby providing the same level of measurement traceability and control. It streamlines documentation and training requirements, thereby facilitating flexibility in personnel assignments. Finally, it offers an opportunity to claim traceability of proficiency test measurements to all included workstations, regardless on which workstation the proficiency test sample was tested. The potential benefits of utilizing this protocol increase with the number of workstations included in the laboratory organization. This guide can be used to identify and quantify benefits derived from corrective actions relating to under-performing workstations. It also provides means to track improved performance after improvements have been made. It is a prerequisite that all users of this guide comply with ISO 17025, especially including the use of documented procedures, the application of statistical control of measurement processes, and participation in proficiency testing. The general principles of this protocol can be adapted to other types of measurements, such as mechanical testing and on-line process control measurements such as temperature and thickness gauging. In these areas, users will likely need to establish their own models for defining measurement quality objectives. Proficiency testing may not be available or applicable. It is especially important that users of this guide take responsibility for ensuring the accuracy of the measurements made by the workstations to be operated under this protocol. In addition to the checks mentioned in 6.2.3, laboratories are encouraged to use other techniques, including, but not limited to, analyzing some materials by independent methods, either within the same laboratory or in collaboration with other equally competent laboratories. The risks associated with generating large volumes of data from carefully harmonized, but incorrectly calibrated multiple workstations are obvious and must be avoided.1.1 This guide describes a protocol for optimizing, controlling, and reporting test method uncertainties from......

Standard Guide for Optimizing, Controlling and Reporting Test Method Uncertainties from Multiple Workstations in the Same Laboratory Organization

ASTM D6689-01 同样试验组织内多层工作台最优控制和报告试验方法不确定性的标准指南

1.1 This guide describes a protocol for optimizing, controlling, and reporting test method uncertainties from multiple workstations in the same laboratory organization. It does not apply when different test methods, dissimilar instruments, or different parts of the same laboratory organization function independently to validate or verify the accuracy of a specific analytical measurement.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use.

Standard Guide for Optimizing, Controlling and Reporting Test Method Uncertainties from Multiple Workstations in the Same Laboratory Organization

ASTM D6512-00 实验室间数值预测的标准规程

1.1 This practice establishes a uniform standard for computing the interlaboratory quantitation estimate associated with Z % relative standard deviation (referred to herein as IQEZ %), and provides guidance concerning the appropriate use and application.1.2 IQEZ % is computed to be the lowest concentration for which a single measurement from a laboratory selected from the population of qualified laboratories represented in an interlaboratory study will have an estimated Z % relative standard deviation (Z % RSD, based on interlaboratory standard deviation), where Z is typically an integer multiple of 10, such as 10, 20, or 30, but Z can be less than 10. The IQE10 % is consistent with the quantitation approaches of Currie () and Oppenheimer, et al ().1.3 The fundamental assumption of the collaborative study is that the media tested, the concentrations tested, and the protocol followed in the study provide a representative and fair evaluation of the scope and applicability of the test method as written. Properly applied, the IQE procedure ensures that the IQE has the following properties:1.3.1 Routinely Achievable IQE ValueMost laboratories are able to attain the IQE quantitation performance in routine analyses, using a standard measurement system, at reasonable cost. This property is needed for a quantitation limit to be feasible in practical situations. Representative laboratories must be included in the data to calculate the IQE.1.3.2 Accounting for Routine Sources of ErrorThe IQE should realistically include sources of bias and variation that are common to the measurement process. These sources include, but are not limited to: intrinsic instrument noise, some "typical" amount of carryover error; plus differences in laboratories, analysts, sample preparation, and instruments.1.3.3 Avoidable Sources of Error ExcludedThe IQE should realistically exclude avoidable sources of bias and variation; that is, those sources that can reasonably be avoided in routine field measurements. Avoidable sources would include, but are not limited to: modifications to the sample; modifications to the measurement procedure; modifications to the measurement equipment of the validated method, and gross and easily discernible transcription errors, provided there was a way to detect and either correct or eliminate them.1.4 The IQE applies to measurement methods for which calibration error is minor relative to other sources, such as when the dominant source of variation is one of the following:1.4.1 Sample Preparationand calibration standards do not have to go through sample preparation.1.4.2 Differences in Analystsand analysts have little opportunity to affect calibration results (as is the case with automated calibration).1.4.3 Differences in Laboratories(for whatever reasons), perhaps difficult to identify and eliminate.1.4.4 Differences in Instruments(measurement equipment), such as differences in manufacturer, model, hardware, electronics, sampling rate, chemical processing rate, integration time, software algorithms, internal signal processing and thresholds, effective sample volume, and contamination level.1.5 Data Quality ObjectivesTypically, one would compute the lowest % RSD possible for any given dataset for a particular method. Thus, if possible, IQE10 % would be computed. If the data indicated that the method was too noisy, one might have to compute instead IQE20 %, or possibly IQE 30 %. In any case, an IQE with a higher % RSD level (such as IQE50 %) would not be considered, though an IQE with RSD 10 % (such as IQE1 %) would be acceptable. The appropriate level of % RSD may depend on the intended use of the IQE.

Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Quantitation Estimate

ASTM D3740-99c 工程设计及建筑中使用的土壤和岩石的试验和或检查中使用试剂评定的规程

1.1 This practice establishes minimum qualifications for agencies engaged in the testing and inspection of soil and rock. Minimum requirements for field and laboratory personnel are defined. The practice also covers the establishment and maintenance of a quality system. 1.2 Criteria are provided for evaluating the capability of an agency to properly perform designated tests on soil and rock, and for establishing essential characteristics pertaining to an agency''s organization, personnel, facilities, and quality system. This practice may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements for particular projects.1.3 This practice can be used as a basis to evaluate testing and inspection agencies, or both, and is intended for use for the qualifying or accrediting, or both, of testing or inspection agencies, public or private, engaged in the testing and inspection of soil and rock as used in engineering design and construction.1.4 This practice is not intended to apply to agencies engaged in chemical testing of soil, rock, and contained fluid. The minimum requirement for those agencies can be found in Specification D5522.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.6 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project''s many unique aspects. The word "Standard" in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.

Standard Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in Engineering Design and Construction

ASTM E1359-99 检查无损检验机构

1.1 This guide establishes areas for review and provides a survey form that can be used in determining the technical competence of a nondestructive testing agency. 1.1.1 Criteria from Practices E543, E1212, and SNTTC-1A were used in the preparation of this guide. The surveyor shall comply with the requirements of Guide E994. 1.2 Areas for review should include, but are not limited to, the following:description of the agency, its facilities and organization; documentation of policies or practices, or both, including a) contract review, b) equipment calibration, and c) personnel qualifications.

Standard Guide for Evaluating Capabilities of Nondestructive Testing Agencies

ASTM D6300-99 用于石油产品和润滑油的试验方法中的精密性和偏差数据测定的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice covers the necessary preparations and planning for the conduct of interlaboratory programs for the development of estimates of precision (determinability, repeatability, and reproducibility) and of bias (absolute and relative), and further presents the standard phraseology for incorporating such information into standard test methods.

Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias Data for Use in Test Methods for Petroleum Products and Lubricants

ASTM E1212-99 无损检验机构质量控制体系的建立和维护

1.1 This practice covers general requirements for the establishment and maintenance of a quality control system for agencies engaged in nondestructive testing (NDT). 1.2 This practice utilizes criteria contained in Practice E543 and Guide E548. 1.3 This practice utilizes criteria contained in ANSI/ ASQC American National Standards Q90 Series. 1.4 This practice recognizes the importance of establishing minimum safety criteria. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Quality Control Systems for Nondestructive Testing Agencies