03.120.20 (Product and company certification. Conf 标准查询与下载

ASTM E2028-99 卷入或可能卷入诉讼中的金属、矿或与金属有关的样品调查结果的接收、检验和报导的标准操作规程

1.1 This practice covers the procedures to be used for receiving, testing, and reporting results of investigation of metals, ores, related materials or samples thereof that have been the subject of an incident that is or is reasonably expected to be the subject of litigation. 1.2 This practice was developed particularly for cases involving civil litigation, however it can be applied to criminal cases where it does not conflict with applicable laws and regulations.

Standard Practice for Receiving, Testing and Reporting Results of Investigation of Metal, Ore, or Metal Related Samples that Are or May Be Involved in Litigation

ASTM ANS/ISO 17025-99 测试和校准实验室能力的一般要求

General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

ASTM E1763-98 化学分析方法的实验室间检验结果的解释和使用的标准指南

1.1 This guide covers procedures to help a task group interpret interlaboratory study (ILS) statistics to state precision and accuracy of a test method and make judgments concerning its range of use. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Guide for Interpretation and Use of Results from Interlaboratory Testing of Chemical Analysis Methods

ASTM E1763-98(2003) 化学分析方法的实验室间检验结果的解释和使用的标准指南

1.1 This guide covers procedures to help a task group interpret interlaboratory study (ILS) statistics to state precision and accuracy of a test method and make judgments concerning its range of use.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Guide for Interpretation and Use of Results from Interlaboratory Testing of Chemical Analysis Methods

ASTM D4182-97 煤和焦炭采样及分析的ASTM法实验室评定

1.1 This practice is limited to the evaluation of laboratories using ASTM procedures under the jurisdiction of Committee D-5 on Coal and Coke. They may be used to evaluate a laboratory's capability to perform the functions for which it has been established. It is not the intention that this practice be used to evaluate capabilities beyond those specifically claimed by the laboratory.

Standard Practice for Evaluation of Laboratories Using ASTM Procedures in the Sampling and Analysis of Coal and Coke

ASTM E860-97 在产品责任诉讼中已列入或可能列入的项目的检验和试验的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for the examination and testing of actual items or systems (hereinafter termed evidence) that may have been involved in a specific incident that is or is reasonably expected to be the subject of products liability litigation. This practice is intended to become applicable when it is determined that examination or testing of the evidence is required. Testing, examination, and alterations that occur in the course of ordinary service or repair operations would not fall within the scope of this practice. 1.2 For additional standards promulgated by ASTM Subcommittee E-30.40 on Technical Aspects of Products Liability Litigation, see Practice E620, E678, and E1020. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Examining and Testing Items that Are or May Become Involved in Litigation

ASTM E860-97(2006) 在产品责任诉讼中已列入或可能列入的项目的检验和试验的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice sets forth guidelines for handling of items that may have been involved in a specific incident that is or is reasonably expected to be the subject of criminal or civil litigation.1.2 The approach outlined is recommended as good professional practice even though the facts and issues of each situation require specific consideration, and may involve matters not expressly dealt with herein. Not every portion of this document may be applicable to every incident or investigation. It is up to the individual preparing the report to apply the appropriate recommended procedures in this guide to a particular incident or investigation. In addition, it is recognized that time and resource limitations or existing policies may limit the degree to which recommendations in this document will be applied in a given investigation. The responsibility of the individual preparing the report ( or anyone who handles or examines evidence) for evidence preservation, and the scope of that responsibility varies based on such factors as the jurisdiction, the status of the individual as a public official or private sector investigator, indications of criminal conduct, and applicable laws and regulations.1.2.1 If compliance with this standard is claimed, the justifications for any such deviations from this standard must be documented.This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Examining And Preparing Items That Are Or May Become Involved In Criminal or Civil Litigation

ASTM E1301-95e1 通过实验室间比对测试熟练程度的标准指南

1.1 While there are a number of uses for interlaboratory tests, and variations in their design and implementation, it is still possible to specify the essential principles that need to be considered when organizing such tests. Part A of this guide defines those principles and describes the factors that should be taken into account in the organization and conduct of proficiency testing programs. 1.2 This guide also covers how laboratory accrediting bodies, which assess technical competence of testing laboratories, should select and use proficiency testing programs (refer to Part B). 1.3 Part A of the guide is intended for use by various parties, such as accrediting bodies, regulatory authorities and clients of laboratory services which have a need to assess the technical competence of laboratories. It is also useful for laboratories in self-evaluation, but recognizes that proficiency testing is only one mechanism that can contribute to establishing equivalent confidence among users of different testing laboratories. 1.4 It is currently a condition of some accreditation bodies that laboratories participate regularly in "approved" proficiency testing programs. Therefore, it is essential that program operators comply with principles for conduct of professionally managed proficiency programs, both in terms of technical requirements and quality management (see Annexes A1 and A2). 1.5 The methods of operation within different proficiency testing organizations are not expected to be identical and this guide does not give specific operational details for interlaboratory test comparisons. It does, however, cover both measurement comparison and testing programs in which large numbers of laboratories (over 20) or small groups of laboratories (1 to 20) are tested. Therefore, the contents of this guide are intended only as a framework to be modified appropriately for particular situations. 1.6 A list of some relevant references is given in Appendix X1.

Standard Guide for Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons

ASTM C1093-95(2001) 单元砌体试验机构认证的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice covers the minimum requirements for laboratory personnel, for establishing and maintaining a quality system, and it establishes minimum qualifications for agencies engaged in the testing of masonry materials. 1.2 Criteria are provided for evaluating the capability of an agency to properly perform designated tests on masonry materials, and for establishing guidelines pertaining to an agency''s organization, personnel, facilities, and quality system. This practice may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements for particular projects. 1.3 This practice can be used as a basis to evaluate testing agencies, and it is intended for use for the qualifying or accrediting of testing agencies, or both, public or private, engaged in the testing of masonry materials. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Accreditation of Testing Agencies for Unit Masonry

ASTM E541-84(1998)e1 从事建成楼房的系统分析和合格保证的机构的标准规范

1.1 This standard was initiated to meet the needs of regulatory programs for the certification of manufactured building. The various statutes differ somewhat in the responsibilities assigned to the administrative agency responsible for implementing the rules and regulations for manufactured building. The administrative agency may utilize the services and facilities of building-evaluation agencies in carrying out its responsibilities for evaluating manufactured building systems. By providing criteria for evaluating these agencies, this standard''s objective is to (1) utilize the voluntary standards system to provide a common base for the various regulatory approaches employed by the authorities having jurisdiction, and (2) make provision for varying degrees of optional technical support for the certification of manufactured building.1.2 To establish an appropriate degree of intra- and inter-state credibility regarding building system evaluations made through governmental or private agencies, the authorities having jurisdiction may wish to utilize an accreditation program for such agencies.1.3 Building-evaluation organizations examined under this standard may include both governmental and private agencies qualified to act on behalf of the public as designee agents (that is, agencies) of the government office having jurisdiction.1.4 This standard covers criteria by which the technical resources of agencies, both governmental and private, may be evaluated for their capability to perform the system analysis or compliance assurance function, or combination thereof, in the evaluation and inspection (certification) of manufactured building. Practice E 651 may be used for the evaluation of such agencies.1.5 These criteria set forth the minimum personnel requirements and the technical and organizational procedures required for agencies engaged in evaluating manufactured building. Other criteria such as independence, financial stability, and objectivity may need to be considered.1.6 Criteria are included for agencies evaluating innovative as well as conventional building systems, against applicable requirements.1.7 Agencies involved in testing, quality assurance and evaluating building components can be evaluated by using Practice E 691.1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in System Analysis and Compliance Assurance for Manufactured Building