Q24 密封材料 标准查询与下载



共找到 845 条与 密封材料 相关的标准,共 57

This part of ISO 16938 specifies a method for determining the staining of porous substrates (e.g. marble, limestone, sandstone, or granite) by sealants used in building construction. The method evaluates the likelihood of a sealant causing an early stain on a porous substrate due to exudation of materials from the sealant. The outcome of the test is specific to the tested sealant and tested substrate and cannot be extrapolated to other sealant formulations or other porous substrates. During this accelerated test, if the sealant does not stain or discolour the substrates, it does not mean that the tested sealant will not stain or discolour the tested porous substrate over a longer time period.

Building construction - Determination of the staining of porous substrates by sealants used in joints - Part 2: Test without compression

ICS
91.100.50
CCS
Q24
发布
2008-03
实施

Elastomeric-Waterstops for sealant of joints in concrete - Part 2: Material specifications and testing

ICS
91.100.50
CCS
Q24
发布
2008-02
实施

Elastomeric-Waterstops for sealant of joints in concrete - Part 1: Shapes and dimensions

ICS
91.100.50
CCS
Q24
发布
2008-02
实施

The compression resistance perpendicular to the faces, the resistance to the extrusion during compression, and the ability to recover after release of the load are indicative of a joint filler''s ability to fill continuously a concrete expansion joint and thereby prevent damage that might otherwise occur during thermal expansion. The asphalt content is a measure of the fiber-type joint filler''s durability and life expectancy. In the case of cork-type fillers, the resistance to water absorption and resistance to boiling hydrochloric acid are relative measures of durability and life expectancy.1.1 These test methods cover the physical properties associated with preformed expansion joint fillers. The test methods include: PropertySection Expansion in Boiling Water7.1 Recovery and Compression7.2 Extrusion7.3 Boiling in Hydrochloric Acid7.4 Asphalt Content7.5 Water Absorption7.6 Density7.7 Note 18212;Specific test methods are applicable only to certain types of joint fillers, as stated herein. 1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Methods for Preformed Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Construction (Nonextruding and Resilient Types)

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

1.1 This specification covers external sealing bands to be used in conjunction with concrete pipe as defined in Terminology C 822 and conforming to Specifications C 14, C 76, C 412, C 478, C 506, C 507, C 655, C 985, C 1417, and C 1433. 1.1.1 Type I, Rubber and Mastic Bands. 1.1.2 Type II, Plastic Film and Mesh Reinforced Mastic Bands. 1.1.3 Type III, Chemically-Bonded Adhesive Butyl Bands. 1.2 This specification is the inch-pound companion to Specification C 877M; therefore, no SI equivalents are presented in the specification. Note 18212;This specification covers only the design and material of the sealing bands. Sealing bands covered by this specification are adequate, when properly installed, for external hydrostatic pressures up to 13 psi, (30 ft) without leakage. The amount of infiltration or exfiltration flow in an installed pipeline is dependent upon many factors other than the sealing bands; allowable quantities and suitable testing of the installed pipeline and system must be covered by other specifications.

Standard Specification for External Sealing Bands for Concrete Pipe, Manholes, and Precast Box Sections

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

From these tests the relative expansive potential of soil-lime mixtures containing varying amounts of lime can be evaluated. From such an evaluation, the amount of lime required to reduce expansion to acceptable levels can be determined. The data can then be used for the design and specification requirements for subgrades and structural fills where expansive soils are encountered and it is desired to give a certain degree of expansion-shrinkage control to structure foundations and road subgrades. The tests will also show if the specific soils are amenable to lime stabilization. Note 28212;The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D 3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspection/and the like. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D 3740 does not in itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D 3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.1.1 These test methods provide procedures for conducting expansion, shrinkage, and uplift pressure tests on compacted soil-lime mixtures and can be used to determine the lime content required to achieve desired control of volume changes caused by increases or decreases of moisture. 1.2 The tests can be used to determine (a) the magnitude of volume changes under varying load conditions, (b) the rate of volume change, and (c) the magnitude of pressure change as moisture changes of the soil-lime mixture take place. The permeability of soil-lime mixture can also, if desired, be determined at the various load conditions. Note 18212;Changes in field conditions can have major effects on the expansion and shrinkage characteristics of expansive soils. Therefore, to the greatest extent possible, initial and anticipated future field conditions should be duplicated, particularly with respect to moisture and density. 1.3 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice D 6026 1.3.1 The method used to specify how data are collected, calculated, or recorded in this standard is not directly related to the accuracy to which the data can be applied in design or other uses, or both. How one applies the results obtained using this standard is beyond its scope. 1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Expansion, Shrinkage, and Uplift Pressure of Soil-Lime Mixtures

ICS
13.080.20 (Physical properties of soil)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

This practice standardizes the preparation of soil-lime mixtures for laboratory testing by engineers and researchers interested in determining properties of soil when stabilized with lime. In this method, mention is made of the mellowing period, but no specific recommendations are made because the mellowing period to be used in testing depends upon each specific use. Note 18212;The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D 3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspection, and the like. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D 3740 does not in itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D 3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.1.1 This practice covers the laboratory preparation of soil-lime mixtures for use in determining the effects of lime on soil properties (plasticity, strength, moisture-density relations, etc.) and the design of mixtures for construction. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgement. Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project''s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved the ASTM consensus process.

Standard Practice for Laboratory Preparation of Soil-Lime Mixtures Using Mechanical Mixer

ICS
93.020 (Earth works. Excavations. Foundation const
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

4.1 Importance of Prequalification—For required accuracy of test results and reliability of certification, it is essential that testing laboratories be prequalified. This practice establishes those qualifications. 4.2 Contractual Relationships: 4.2.1 Although testing laboratories may be qualified in accordance with this practice, it is important for the contracting authority to consider the relationship of the testing laboratory with other interested parties before engaging the laboratory to perform the testing. The other interested parties in the project usually consist of the manufacturer of the material to be tested, the contractor (bidder), the owner of the project (user and contracting authority), and the architect who serves as the owner's agent in preparing the contract documents. 4.2.2 Many sealant manufacturers have their own qualified testing facilities that are used to conduct research and maintain quality control of their products. Generally, the companies that have such facilities are willing to certify as to the performance standards with which their products comply. The contracting authority should determine if there are conflicting interests in such a relationship. The contracting authority may prefer that the product testing to ascertain conformance with specific performance standards and the reporting of such testing be performed by a qualified but independent testing laboratory. The contract documents should make this requirement known so that bidders can bid accordingly. 4.2.3 The testing of each caulking and sealant for each and every project can be costly. On a small building project, the cost of testing, if required, may be more than the cost of the sealant materials. On a large project, on the other hand, the cost of testing a sealant with accompanying certification by a qualified independent testing laboratory may be small in comparison to the sealant materials and commensurate with the assurances desired by the contracting authority. 4.3 Requirements in Contract Documents : 4.3.1 In addition to specifying the performance standards that the caulking and sealants to be used on a project shall be in compliance with, state that proof of compliance shall be in the form of certification by a testing laboratory meeting the requirements of this practice. 4.3.2 If the contracting authority desires that the testing and certification be by an independent testing laboratory this additional requirement should be included with the requirements stated in 4.3.1. 1.1 This practice describes the qualifications, including minimum requirements for personnel and equipment, duties, responsibilities, and services of independent commercial materials testing laboratories engaged in the testing of caulking and sealants used in building construction. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.3 The subcommittee with jurisdiction of this standard is not aware of any similar or equivalent ISO standard.

Standard Practice for Laboratories Engaged in Testing of Building Sealants

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

5.1 This test method is used as a screening tool to determine the hydrostatic pressure to which a liquid-applied waterproofing membrane may be subjected without failing when stretched over a crack in the substrate. This test method discriminates between a membrane that is very resistant to hydrostatic pressure and one that is not. Because of the variability inherent in this test method, it is not recommended that this test method be used to set a numerical standard for hydrostatic pressure resistance. No prediction of durability at lower hydrostatic pressures can be made when using the results of this test method. 1.1 This test method describes a laboratory procedure for determining the resistance of a waterproofing membrane to hydrostatic pressure. 1.2 The committee with jurisdiction over this standard is not aware of any comparable standards published by other organizations. 1.3 There are no ISO standards similar or equivalent to this ASTM standard. 1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Hydrostatic Pressure Resistance of a Liquid-Applied Waterproofing Membrane

ICS
91.100.50
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

Staining of building materials is an aesthetically undesirable occurrence. This test method evaluates the likelihood of a sealant causing an early stain on a porous substrate due to exudation of materials from the sealant. Since this is an accelerated test, it does not necessarily predict that the tested sealants will not stain or discolor porous substrates over longer periods of time.1.1 This test method covers four types of laboratory tests to determine if a joint sealant has a probability of staining a porous substrate (such as marble, limestone, sandstone, and granite). The tests are on compressed samples and include (1) storage under standard laboratory conditions, (2) storage in an oven, and (3) exposure in a fluorescent UV/condensation device, and (4) exposure in a xenon arc device. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 The committee with jurisdiction over this standard is not aware of any comparable standards published by other organizations.

Standard Test Method for Staining of Porous Substrate by Joint Sealants

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

1.1 This specification provides requirements for membrane-forming liquids suitable for use as curing compounds and sealers on freshly placed concrete and as sealers on hardened concrete. These membranes have special properties, such as, alkali resistance, acid resistance, adhesion-promoting qualities, and resistance to degradation by UV light. Note 18212;For liquid membrane-forming curing compounds specified primarily by their ability to retain water in newly placed concrete (and by drying time, and for white pigmented products, reflectance), see Specification C 309. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. (Inch pound units are shown in parentheses). 1.3 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the test methods portion, Section 8, of this specification. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 This is a performance specification. The allowable composition of products covered by this specification is limited by various local, regional, and national regulations. Issues related to air quality (solvent emission), worker exposure, and other hazards are not addressed here. It is the responsibility of the producers and users of these materials to comply with pertinent regulations.Warning—Some VOC exempt solvents used to meet the regulations are extremely flammable with low auto ignition temperatures and rapid evaporation rates. Consult the manufacturer''s product information sheet for important application and safety information.

Standard Specification for Liquid Membrane-Forming Compounds Having Special Properties for Curing and Sealing Concrete

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

Construction utilizing lightweight walls and floors can have undesirable sound transmission characteristics if care is not taken to seal joints and voids that are common to this type of construction. By sealing these penetrations the transmission of sound can be diminished.1.1 This practice is a guide for the use of sealants to reduce the sound transmission characteristics of interior walls, ceilings, and floors by proper application of sealants to joints, voids, and penetrations normally found in building construction. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.3 The committee with jurisdiction over this standard is not aware of any comparable standards published by other organizations.

Standard Practice for Use of Sealants in Acoustical Applications

ICS
91.120.20 (Acoustics in buildings. Sound insulatio
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

Post dispensing volumetric expansion factor F ¯ indicates the ratio of the fully cured foam sealant volume and the initially dispensed foam sealant volume. For example, if the expansion factor F ¯ were 2, the fully cured foam would double its initial volume; therefore, one should fill 50 % of the cavity uniformly to anticipate the full coverage upon curing. Post dispensing volumetric expansion factor F ¯ does not predict the performance capability of the foam sealants of the suitability for the intended applications. This test method is intended to lend guidance in product selection as related to the post dispensing expansion characteristics of the aerosol foam sealants. This test method recognizes that the results are reflective of controlled laboratory conditions. Post dispensing expansion in field applications may vary according to temperature, humidity, and surfaces that the aerosol foam sealants are in contact with.1.1 This test method measures the volumetric expansion of aerosol foam sealants after dispensing. 1.2 This test method provides a means for estimating the quantity of initial material required to dispense in order to fill a cavity. 1.3 Aerosol foam sealants are used for a variety of applications intended to reduce airflow through the building envelope. 1.4 This test method applies to two types of single component aerosol foam sealants: polyurethane and latex. 1.5 There are no other known standard test methods to measure aerosol foam sealants post dispensing expansion. 1.6 Values are reported in SI units only. Certain apparatus and supply items are referenced in inch-pound units for purchasing purposes. 1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method to Measuring the Post Dispensing Volumetric Expansion of Aerosol Foam Sealants

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

Importance of Prequalification8212; For required accuracy of test results and reliability of certification, it is essential that testing laboratories be prequalified. This practice establishes those qualifications. Contractual Relationships: Although testing laboratories may be qualified in accordance with this practice, it is important for the contracting authority to consider the relationship of the testing laboratory with other interested parties before engaging the laboratory to perform the testing. The other interested parties in the project usually consist of the manufacturer of the material to be tested, the contractor (bidder), the owner of the project (user and contracting authority), and the architect who serves as the owner''s agent in preparing the contract documents. Many sealant manufacturers have their own qualified testing facilities that are used to conduct research and maintain quality control of their products. Generally, the companies that have such facilities are willing to certify as to the performance standards with which their products comply. The contracting authority should determine if there are conflicting interests in such a relationship. The contracting authority may prefer that the product testing to ascertain conformance with specific performance standards and the reporting of such testing be performed by a qualified but independent testing laboratory. The contract documents should make this requirement known so that bidders can bid accordingly. The testing of each caulking and sealant for each and every project can be costly. On a small building project, the cost of testing, if required, may be more than the cost of the sealant materials. On a large project, on the other hand, the cost of testing a sealant with accompanying certification by a qualified independent testing laboratory may be small in comparison to the sealant materials and commensurate with the assurances desired by the contracting authority. Requirements in Contract Documents: In addition to specifying the performance standards that the caulking and sealants to be used on a project shall be in compliance with, state that proof of compliance shall be in the form of certification by a testing laboratory meeting the requirements of this practice. If the contracting authority desires that the testing and certification be by an independent testing laboratory this additional requirement should be included with the requirements stated in 4.3.1. 1.1 This practice describes the qualifications, including minimum requirements for personnel and equipment, duties, responsibilities, and services of independent commercial materials testing laboratories engaged in the testing of caulking and sealants used in building construction. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.3 The subcommittee with jurisdiction of this standard is not aware of any similar or equivalent ISO standard.

Standard Practice for Laboratories Engaged in Testing of Building Sealants

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

This test method is used as a screening tool to determine the hydrostatic pressure to which a liquid-applied waterproofing membrane may be subjected without failing when stretched over a crack in the substrate. This test method discriminates between a membrane that is very resistant to hydrostatic pressure and one that is not. Because of the variability inherent in this test method, it is not recommended that this test method be used to set a numerical standard for hydrostatic pressure resistance. No prediction of durability at lower hydrostatic pressures can be made when using the results of this test method.1.1 This test method describes a laboratory procedure for determining the resistance of a waterproofing membrane to hydrostatic pressure. 1.2 The committee with jurisdiction over this standard is not aware of any comparable standards published by other organizations. 1.3 There are no ISO standards similar or equivalent to this ASTM standard. 1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to inch-pound units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Hydrostatic Pressure Resistance of a Liquid-Applied Waterproofing Membrane

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

Seams in some resilient flooring are heat sealed to prevent openings from forming between cut edges and to prevent penetrations of dirt, liquids, etc., into the seams. Decorative appearances may also be achieved using contrasting heat weld thread (rod).1.1 This practice covers the instructions and precautions to be observed to ensure satisfactory performance of seams in resilient flooring sealed by the heat weld method. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. See precaution information in 6.1.

Standard Practice for Sealing Seams of Resilient Flooring Products by the Heat Weld Method (when Recommended)

ICS
97.150 (Non-textile floor coverings)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

1.1 This test method covers four types of laboratory tests to determine if a joint sealant has a probability of staining a porous substrate (such as marble, limestone, sandstone, and granite). The tests are on compressed samples and include (1) storage under standard laboratory conditions, (2) storage in an oven, and (3) exposure in a fluorescent UV/condensation device, and (4) exposure in a xenon arc device. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 The committee with jurisdiction over this standard is not aware of any comparable standards published by other organizations.

Standard Test Method for Staining of Porous Substrate by Joint Sealants

ICS
91.100.50 (Binders. Sealing materials)
CCS
Q24
发布
2008
实施

1.1.2.1 802.3 Compound The pumpable and gunnable compound is used to bed glass to the surrounding substrate and is intended to remain ductile and prevent air infiltration and water leakage. Type I is recommended for intermittent water contact. Type II is recommended for extended water contact, but not continuous immersion. 1.1.2.2 805.2 Compound The pumpable and gunnable compound is used to bed glass to the surrounding substrate and is intended to bond or adhere the glass to the substrate and prevent air infiltration and water leakage. Group C demonstrates predominately cohesive failure, while Group A is limited to chemically curing sealants which demonstrate adhesive failure, when tested for peel adhesion according to Section 2.4.1 or lap shear according to Section 2.20. NOTE 1: Sealant manufacturers may choose to test sealants to either of the ,following sections or to both to quali)5; to AAMA 805.2 Groups A and C: Sections 1.1.4.3.3 (Group ,4) and 1.1.4.3.4 (Group C);or Section 1.1.4.4. The use of lap shear testing following exposures is offered to meet the needs of window manufacturers for sealant strength data which may be used for window design and estimating strength after accelerated aging. This data may provide insight on sealant durability and performance.

Voluntary Specification and Test Methods for Sealants

ICS
CCS
Q24
发布
2007-09
实施

本标准规定了建筑门窗及玻璃镶嵌用弹性密封胶的产品分类、要求、试验方法、检验规则和标志、包装、运输、贮存的基本要求。 本标准适用于硅酮、改性硅酮、聚硫、聚氨酯、丙烯酸酯、丁基、丁苯、氯丁等合成高分子材料为主要成分的弹性密封胶。

Glazing elastic sealants for building

ICS
91.100.50
CCS
Q24
发布
2007-05-29
实施
2007-11-01

本标准规定了适用于混凝土裂缝用环氧树脂灌浆材料的术语和定义、分类、一般要求、技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输与贮存等。 本标准适用于修补混凝土裂缝用的环氧树脂灌浆材料。

Epoxy grouting resin for concrete crack

ICS
91.100.50
CCS
Q24
发布
2007-05-29
实施
2007-11-01



Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号