以下12点内容是老师和我从收集的审稿人意见中总结出来的，希望能对大家的写作有所帮助，也希望大家能给与支持。其中的错误，请各位大牛不吝赐教。以下12点是随机排序，无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript. needs careful editing by
someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention
to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and
results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and
statistical methods used in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these
various experiments should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the
study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not
show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer
formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：
A hypothesis needs to be presented
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume
ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义：
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,
write one section to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so
novel.
9、对claim,如A>B的证明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with
previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an
improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove
that.
11、格式(重视程度)：
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It
is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with
"Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is
properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the
formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and
Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题)：
有关语言的审稿人意见：
◆ It is noted that your manuscript. needs careful editing by
someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention
to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and
results of the study are clear to the reader.
◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper
translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review
be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are
not complete sentences.
◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal.
There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause
construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript. must be improved before
resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague
who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.
◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and
the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth
once it has been edited because the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript. titled "……"
which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B -
Applied Biomaterials.
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of
publication.
引用
删除
hongjingzi / 2009-11-17 11:24:48
