37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment) 标准查询与下载



共找到 68 条与 相关的标准,共 5

3.1 A common set of definitions is essential to improve communication and avoid misunderstanding among manufacturers of printing ink, printing ink vehicles, resins, solvents, oils and all other components of printing ink vehicles. 1.1 This standard contains the definitions of terms as used in reference to printing ink vehicles and related materials.

Standard Terminology for Printing Ink Vehicles and Related Materials

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
A17
发布
2013
实施

1.1 This practice covers specific procedures and test conditions that are applicable for xenon-arc exposure of ink jet media prints conducted in accordance with Practices G151 and G155. The laboratory accelerated procedure is intended to determine the relative lightfastness of ink jet prints in office environments where window filtered daylight is used for illumination. 1.2 The two criteria used to determine relative lightfastness are instrumental color change and change in optical density. 1.3 This practice is useful in determining the relative lightfastness of a series of prints or the relation of the lightfastness of the print of interest to the performance of controls with known lightfastness exposed simultaneously. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in section 8. 1.5 There is no equivalent ISO standard.

Standard Practice for Determining the Relative Lightfastness of Ink Jet Prints Exposed to Window Filtered Daylight Using a Xenon Arc Light Apparatus

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2012
实施

Abrasion resistance during transport and storage is essential to prevent marring of type matter, designs, or protective coatings on the exterior of labels and other printed materials. Recognizing that the actual amount of abrasion occurring in the field depends on relative humidity, temperature, tightness of packing, and a host of other variables, this test method provides a rapid means for comparing the abrasion resistance of test surfaces under laboratory conditions. It is useful for specification acceptance between the supplier and the customer. This test method can also be used to evaluate the relative abrasion resistance of printed inks, varnishes, laminates and substrates, and the abrasiveness of inks.1.1 This test method covers the procedure for determining the abrasion resistance of printed matter using a GA-CAT Comprehensive Abrasion Tester. 1.2 This test method is applicable to packaging labels, book, catalog, and magazine covers, bar codes, corrugated boxes, and other containers having applied graphics on any flat substrate. It is not recommended for powder coatings. 1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Printed Matter by the GA-CAT Comprehensive Abrasion Tester

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
A17
发布
2009
实施

This practice may be used to evaluate the performance of different toners in a common machine. It can also be used to evaluate the economics of toner usage when making machine-to-machine comparisons. The practice provides only a point estimate that is subject to a significant number of variables that are not easily measured. As with all dry developers, two-component developer systems are not 100 % efficient. Some toner is lost to the surroundings (inside or outside the copier). This loss is also dependent on copier adjustments and may be significant enough to affect the total number of copies capable of being produced by a specific amount of toner. Anyone making a decision based on the results of this practice should carefully consider the accuracy of the results and other pertinent data. Actual use of the copier in normal operating conditions will most likely result in toner usage values different from those generated in this practice.1.1 This practice describes a procedure for estimating the number of copies that can be produced for a given unit of toner in a copier using dry two-component developer. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. See Section 9 for specific precautionary statements.

Standard Practice for Estimating Toner Usage in Copiers Utilizing Dry Two-Component Developer

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
N47
发布
2009
实施

The copy image quality is affected by many factors; including the copier, supplies, and environmental conditions. The density and background image quality is particularly significant relative to aesthetic appearance, the visual impression of blackness, and the ability to distinguish information from background. The test target may also be used to evaluate the copier or supplies. 1.1 This test method covers the description and method of use for a density and background test target for office copier image evaluation. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precautionary statements, see Section 8.

Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Large Area Density and Background on Office Copiers

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
Y54
发布
2009
实施

5.1 The Atlantek test system allows simulation of direct thermal printers in the marketplace. Thus, this system is useful in matching direct thermal product performance to various printer configurations. 5.2 This test system is useful for new product development. Direct thermal printer manufacturers can design print control algorithms to match particular thermal imaging products. Thermal imaging product manufacturers can formulate and design products (media) to provide a match with certain printer designs. 5.3 Manufacturing process control can make thermal response comparisons relative to process changes. 5.4 Customers for thermal products can use this test method to compare supplies from various manufacturers. 5.5 The test system can be used to evaluate thermal response of facsimile, label, medical recorder, plotter, and other direct thermal products (media). 5.6 Performance differences between printheads and media combinations can be measured and presented graphically. 1.1 This test method covers the measurement of thermal response of various direct thermal imaging papers or other thermal-coated substrates used for facsimile, labels, medical recorders, plotters, and printers. 1.2 The Atlantek Thermal Response Tester Model 200 described in this test method may be used for specification acceptance, product development, and research applications. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard; values specific to the Atlantek Thermal Response Tester Model 200 are in SI units. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precautionary statements, see Section 8.

Standard Test Method for Determining the Dynamic Thermal Response of Direct Thermal Imaging Productsmdash;Atlantek Method

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2008
实施

1.1 This guide covers a list of test methods, practices, guides, and specifications that can be used for the testing and evaluation of printing ink vehicles and components thereof (see Table 1).2TABLE 1 Numerical Listing of Ink Vehicle Related Standards ASTM Designation Volume 8199;8199;8199;8199;8199;8199;Title D16 06.01 Terminology for Paint, Related Coatings, Materials and Applications D56 05.01 Test Method for Flash Point by Tag Closed Cup Tester D86 05.01 Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure D92 05.01 Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester D93 05.01 Test Method for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester D154 06.03 Guide for Testing Varnishes D156 05.01 Test Method for Saybolt Color of Petroleum Products (Saybolt Chromometer Method) D445

Standard Guide for Testing Printing Ink Vehicles and Components Thereof

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
A17
发布
2007
实施

1.1 This guide covers a list of test methods, practices, guides, and specifications that can be used for the testing and evaluation of printing ink vehicles and components thereof (see Table 1).1.2 This guide includes methods that were developed to test impact and non-impact inks and vehicles associated with letterpress, lithography, flexography and gravure. Tests on raw materials and analytical tests in general have been included.1.3 Other ASTM standards not specified here may also be applicable.This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use.

Standard Guide for Testing Printing Ink Vehicles and Components Thereof

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
A17
发布
2007
实施

This practice is for determining the color response of an electrostatic copy system by examining the black and white copies obtained from an electrostatic copier. This practice covers the capability of a copy system to reproduce various solid colors in varying shades of grey or black and white.1.1 This practice covers the determination of the color response of an electrostatic copy system, black and white output. 1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Determination of Color Response of Electrostatic Copying System, Black and White Output

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
N47
发布
2006
实施

This practice is for determining the color response of an electrostatic copy system by examining the black and white copies obtained from an electrostatic copier. This practice covers the capability of a copy system to reproduce various solid colors in varying shades of grey or black and white.1.1 This practice covers the determination of the color response of an electrostatic copy system, black and white output.This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Determination of Color Response of Electrostatic Copying System, Black and White Output

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
N47
发布
2006
实施

1.1 This practice describes procedures to obtain subjective, but comparative data for scratch hardness and scrape adhesion of coatings and color images produced by printers, copies and other reprographic devices.1.2 This method simulates conditions where the surface of various substrates such as paper, film, cloth, and so forth may be subject to failure under mechanical force. 1.3 This test method covers the determination of the scratch hardness and scrape adhesion of coatings. Results are expressed in terms of force-to scratch coatings on substrates used in printing.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Determining the Scratch Hardness and Scrape Adhesion of Prints and Coatings

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
A17
发布
2005
实施

The image life of printed media displayed in both typical office and outdoor environments is dependent on coating scratch resistance. While natural aging is the most reliable method of assessing coating scratch resistance, the length of the time required makes this method impractical for most materials. Factors in the office and outdoor environments, such as heat, cold, thermal shock, ultraviolet/visible radiation and water vapor can have similar effect on the scratch resistance of coatings and prints as mechanical force. Good scratch resistance is a prime consideration for coated media and prints. Highly absorptive coatings in digital printing have a tendency to dusting, flaking and cracking when folded. This practice utilizing mechanical force allows comparative studies of coated and printed media. It is most useful in providing relative ratings for media which exhibit significant differences in performance.1.1 This practice describes procedures to obtain subjective, but comparative data for scratch hardness and scrape adhesion of coatings and color images produced by printers, copies and other reprographic devices. 1.2 This method simulates conditions where the surface of various substrates such as paper, film, cloth, and so forth may be subject to failure under mechanical force. 1.3 This test method covers the determination of the scratch hardness and scrape adhesion of coatings. Results are expressed in terms of force-to scratch coatings on substrates used in printing. 1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Determining the Scratch Hardness and Scrape Adhesion of Prints and Coatings

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2005
实施

1.1 This procedure provides a test method by which electro-photographic copiers and similar office imaging equipment may be rated for energy consumption.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Determining Energy Consumption of Copiers and Similar Office Imaging Equipment

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
N47
发布
2005
实施

1.1 This procedure provides a test method by which multifunctional devices (MFDs) with electro-photographic copying capability and similar office imaging equipment may be rated for energy consumption.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Determining Energy Consumption of MFDs with Copying Capability and Similar Office Imaging Equipment

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
N47
发布
2005
实施

1.1 This procedure provides a test method by which electro-photographic copiers and similar office imaging equipment may be rated for energy consumption. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Determining Energy Consumption of Copiers and Similar Office Imaging Equipment

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2005
实施

Abrasion resistance is a desirable and sometimes critical property of printed materials. Abrasion damage can occur during shipment, storage, handling, and end use. The result is a significant decrease in product appearance and legibility of product information. The amount of abrasion damage to a printed substrate is dependent on shipping conditions, possibly temperature and humidity, time, and many other variables. This practice provides a way of comparing abrasion resistance of printed materials under laboratory conditions. This practice also can be used to evaluate the relative abrasion and scuff resistance of printed and unprinted inkjet media. This practice can provide a reasonably simple procedure that can be used by both the buyer and the seller of printed materials to determine if the product offered for sale meets some predetermined standard for abrasion or scuff resistance.1.1 This practice covers a procedure for determining the abrasion resistance of printed and unprinted inkjet media using the Sutherland Rub Tester, or its equivalent, equipped with full-width rubber pads and using standardized receptors. 1.2 This practice is applicable to printed and unprinted inkjet media. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Abrasion and Scuff Resistance of Inkjet Media by the Sutherland Rub Tester

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2005
实施

Lightfastness of printed ink jet media for specified periods of time is pertinent to the end use of these materials. Since the ability of ink jet prints to withstand color changes is a function of the spectral power distribution of the light source to which it is exposed, it is important that lightfastness be assessed under the conditions appropriate to the end use application. While ink jet prints may be handled and displayed under a variety of conditions, this practice is intended to produce the color changes that may occur in ink jet prints upon exposure to irradiation from daylight filtered through window glass by simulating these conditions. The accelerated procedure covered in this practice is intended to provide a means for the rapid evaluation of relative lightfastness under laboratory test conditions. The Practice does not provide a rating of the lightfastness of the prints, but determines the lightfastness ranking of a series of prints or the performance compared to controls with known lightfastness. Test results are useful for specification acceptance between producer and user, for quality control, and for research and product development. Color changes may not be a linear function of duration of exposure. The preferred method of determining effect of the light is to expose the prints for a number of intervals and to assess the exposure time required to obtain a specific color change or change in optical density. 1.1 This practice covers specific procedures and test conditions that are applicable for xenon-arc exposure of ink jet media prints conducted in accordance with Practices G 151 and G 155. The laboratory accelerated procedure is intended to determine the relative lightfastness of ink jet prints in office environments where window filtered daylight is used for illumination.1.2 The two criteria used to determine relative lightfastness are instrumental color change and change in optical density.1.3 This practice is useful in determining the relative lightfastness of a series of prints or the relation of the lightfastness of the print of interest to the performance of controls with known lightfastness exposed simultaneously. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in section .1.4 There is no equivalent ISO standard.

Standard Practice for Determining the Relative Lightfastness of Ink Jet Prints Exposed to Window Filtered Daylight Using a Xenon Arc Light Apparatus

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
L63
发布
2005
实施

1.1 This practice covers a procedure for determining the abrasion resistance of printed and unprinted inkjet media using the Sutherland Rub Tester, or its equivalent, equipped with full-width rubber pads and using standardized receptors.1.2 This practice is applicable to printed and unprinted inkjet media.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Abrasion and Scuff Resistance of Inkjet Media by the Sutherland Rub Tester

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
A17
发布
2005
实施

Lightfastness of printed ink jet media for specified periods of time is pertinent to the end use of these materials. Since the ability of ink jet prints to withstand color changes is a function of the spectral power distribution of the light source to which it is exposed, it is important that lightfastness be assessed under the conditions appropriate to the end use application. While ink jet prints may be handled and displayed under a variety of conditions, this practice is intended to produce the color changes that may occur in ink jet prints upon exposure to irradiation from daylight filtered through window glass by simulating these conditions. The accelerated procedure covered in this practice is intended to provide a means for the rapid evaluation of relative lightfastness under laboratory test conditions. The Practice does not provide a rating of the lightfastness of the prints, but determines the lightfastness ranking of a series of prints or the performance compared to controls with known lightfastness. Test results are useful for specification acceptance between producer and user, for quality control, and for research and product development. Color changes may not be a linear function of duration of exposure. The preferred method of determining effect of the light is to expose the prints for a number of intervals and to assess the exposure time required to obtain a specific color change or change in optical density. 1.1 This practice covers specific procedures and test conditions that are applicable for xenon-arc exposure of ink jet media prints conducted in accordance with Practices G151 and G155. The laboratory accelerated procedure is intended to determine the relative lightfastness of ink jet prints in office environments where window filtered daylight is used for illumination. 1.2 The two criteria used to determine relative lightfastness are instrumental color change and change in optical density. 1.3 This practice is useful in determining the relative lightfastness of a series of prints or the relation of the lightfastness of the print of interest to the performance of controls with known lightfastness exposed simultaneously. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in section 8. 1.5 There is no equivalent ISO standard.

Standard Practice for Determining the Relative Lightfastness of Ink Jet Prints Exposed to Window Filtered Daylight Using a Xenon Arc Light Apparatus

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2005
实施

1.1 This procedure provides a test method by which multifunctional devices (MFDs) with electro-photographic copying capability and similar office imaging equipment may be rated for energy consumption. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Determining Energy Consumption of MFDs with Copying Capability and Similar Office Imaging Equipment

ICS
37.100.10 (Reproduction equipment)
CCS
发布
2005
实施



Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号