BS PD CEN/TR 16092-2011
电子自动收费系统预付系统要求

Electronic fee collection. Requirements for pre-payment systems

非常抱歉，我们暂时无法提供预览，您可以试试： 免费下载 BS PD CEN/TR 16092-2011 前三页，或者稍后再访问。

注意： 点击下载后，生成下载文件时间比较长，请耐心等待......

标准号

BS PD CEN/TR 16092-2011

发布日期

2011年03月31日

实施日期

2011年03月31日

废止日期

无

中国标准分类号

R85

国际标准分类号

03.220.20;35.240.60

发布单位

GB-BSI

引用标准

EN 15509 prEN ISO 12855 EN ISO 14906 prEN ISO 17573 CEN ISO/TS 25110 ISO 4217 ISO/IEC 7810 ISO/IEC 7816-1 ISO/IEC 7816-2 ISO/IEC 7816-3 ISO/IEC 7816-4 ISO/IEC 7816-6 ISO/IEC 7816-8 ISO/IEC 14443-1 ISO/IEC 14443-2 ISO/IEC 14443-3 ISO/IEC 14443-4 ISO/IEC 15

适用范围

This technical report (TR) analyses requirements for a universal Pre-Pay account system for EFC including the following issues:  relations to other existing standards in this domain;  the core requirements and functionality that must be provided. This technical report will show an analysis of the requirements for a universal prepay system and categorise possible different types of pre-pay solutions, in terms of functionality, technical and legal considerations. As far as legal requirements are concerned it will be clarified whether the pre-payment means fall within the scope of European Directive 2000/46/EC on the taking up, pursuit of and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions and whether the medium-issuing organisation has to act as a financial institution and falls within the scope of the Payment Service Directive 2007/64/EC. The latter applying exactly to payment activities undertaken by entities but do not require a full bank license. The technical report will describe the current state-of-affairs of EFC pre-payment systems, including the demand for standards and inventory of provisions provided by standards. It will identify and prioritize gaps in terms of standards or other enablers needed in order for the market to provide viable pre-payment solutions in a European context. There are two general approaches to represent the content of the TR: a) allocate each requirement under each pre-pay solution; b) allocate each pre-pay solution under each requirement. To achieve a better understanding and readability alternative a) has been decided (this refers to Clause 8 and Clause 9 only). The TR does not give any decision on how or whether one of the pre-payment solutions described is commercially feasible to be considered as an implementable offer to the Service User. The return for invest for any TSP regarding the system architecture requirements and other obligations (refunding of SU) is questionable. This TR just gives a summary of the requirements of possible pre-pay solutions. It is up to decision makers to evaluate the alternatives in the light of their individual preconditions of their tolling regime and of market acceptance.