实验方法> 生物信息学技术> 数据库>Overview of Experimental Models of the Blood‐Brain Barrier in CNS Drug Discovery

Overview of Experimental Models of the Blood‐Brain Barrier in CNS Drug Discovery

关键词: experimental models blood brain来源: 互联网

  • Abstract
  • Table of Contents
  • Figures
  • Literature Cited

Abstract

 

The blood?brain barrier (BBB) is a physical and metabolic entity that isolates the brain from the systemic circulation. The barrier consists of tight junctions between endothelial cells that contain egress transporters and catabolic enzymes. To cross the BBB, a drug must possess the appropriate physicochemical properties to achieve a sufficient time?concentration profile in brain interstitial fluid (ISF). In this overview, we review techniques to measure BBB permeation, which is evidenced by the free concentration of compound in brain ISF over time. We consider a number of measurement techniques, including in vivo microdialysis and brain receptor occupancy following perfusion. Consideration is also given to the endothelial and nonendothelial cell systems used to assess both the BBB permeation of a test compound and its interactions with egress transporters, and computer models employed for predicting passive permeation and the probability of interactions with BBB transporters. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol . 62:7.15.1?7.15.30. © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Keywords: blood?brain barrier; brain disorders; drug discovery; neuroscience; in vivo microdialysis; MDCK cells; receptor occupancy; brain medicines; brain disorders

        GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Structure and Function of the BBB
  • The BBB and Immune System Function
  • Assessing BBB Permeability
  • Physicochemical Determinants of Transcellular BBB Transport
  • Assessing Efflux Transport
  • Brain Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and their Relationship
  • Conclusions
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
  • Tables

        GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library Materials

 

GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library Figures

  •   Figure 7.15.1 The blood‐brain barrier. Endothelial cells are joined by cell adhesion molecules to form a permeability barrier (the blood‐brain barrier) between blood and brain interstitial fluid. Other components of the blood–brain barrier include pericytes, glial cells (astrocyte endfeet), and the basal membrane. These cells form an integrated (neurovascular) unit that controls critical BBB functions.
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.2 Localization of the major compound efflux transporters on brain capillary endothelial cells of the blood‐brain barrier (BBB). They include P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp), multidrug‐resistant protein (MRP)‐1 to MRP6 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). These ATP‐binding cassette proteins transport a variety of substrates, including amino acids, sugars, drugs, toxins, lipids, sterols, endogenous metabolites, nucleotides, and ions. In addition to these ABC transporters, several members of the organic anion‐transporting‐polypeptide (OATP) family and the organic anion transporter (OAT) family are expressed in brain endothelial cells. In the OAT family, there is evidence for OAT3 expression in human brain capillary endothelial cells with predominant abluminal localization.
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.3 A schematic diagram showing the various routes of transport across the blood‐brain barrier (BBB). (A ) Under normal circumstances, the tight junctions severely restrict penetration of hydrophilic compounds. (B ) Lipophilic compounds with a molecular weight <450 Da can diffuse across the BBB; this is the route by which most CNS drugs enter the brain. (C ) Both hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds can be transported out of the brain by a variety of egress transporters, principally P‐glycoprotein and BCRP. (D ) The BBB contains transport proteins (carriers) for glucose, amino acids, nucleosides, and other substances. (E ) Certain proteins, such as insulin and transferrin, are transported by specific receptor‐mediated endocytosis and transcytosis. (F ) Plasma proteins, such as albumin, are poorly transported, but cationization can increase their uptake by adsorptive‐mediated endocytosis and transcytosis. Modified from Begley ().
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.4 Concentration‐time profile in plasma following administration of a compound. T max = time to reach maximal concentration. T 1/2 = the period of time required for the concentration or amount of a compound to be reduced by one‐half. C AE = concentration required to cause an adverse event. C max = the maximal concentration achieved. C TE = the concentration required to evoke a therapeutic effect. AUC = ∫ Cdt , and represents a measure of total drug exposure. The therapeutic ratio = C AE / C max .
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.5 Structure of BBB tight junctions. The tight junctions contain occludin and claudins, particularly types 3, 5, and 12, which associate and bind to each other across the intercellular cleft. Both the claudins and occludin are associated with the scaffolding proteins, zonula occludens 1, 2, and 3 (ZO‐1 to ZO‐3), which are, in turn, linked (via cingulin dimers) to the actin/myosin cytoskeletal system within the cell. This system is activated by increases in the concentration of intracellular calcium. The role of the junction‐associated molecules (JAMs) is not yet clear, but like the endothelial cell‐selective adhesion molecule (ESAM), it is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Other proteins that span the intercellular cleft and are bound by homophilic adhesion constitute adherens junctions. They are the platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM‐1), also known as cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31), and VE‐cadherin.
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.6 Use of Transwell apparatus cells to provide a measure of the BBB permeation of compounds and their ability to act as P‐gp substrates. Monolayers of cells (e.g., MDCK cells expressing the gene for human P‐gp) are cultured on a semipermeable membrane to form tight cell‐cell junctions. The inner well containing the cells is called the apical (A) compartment while the outer well is called the basolateral (B) compartment. A CNS‐active agent is added to either compartment A or to compartment B and the movement of CNS‐active agent is measured over time and P app values are determined.
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.7 A microdialysis probe of concentric design. The probe is stereotaxically placed into the CNS (usually the brain) and isotonic perfusate is pumped through the probe at a slow flow rate. CNS‐active compound in the interstitial fluid then diffuses through the semipermeable membrane at the end of the probe and the flow of perfusate moves it out of the probe, where the dialysate is collected for subsequent analysis.
    View Image
  •   Figure 7.15.8 Model of the disposition of a CNS‐active compound in blood, brain, and CSF. The unbound concentration of a CNS‐active agent in blood [ C u(blood) ] is in equilibrium with the bound concentration in blood [ C (blood) ] and determines its unbound concentration in brain interstitial fluid [ C u(brain ISF ] and cerebrospinal fluid [ C u(CSF) )] by equilibration across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the blood‐CSF barrier (BCSFB), respectively. Clearance from brain ISF occurs by bulk flow [ Cl (bulk) ] and brain metabolic clearance [ Cl (metab) ], and the unbound concentration of CNS‐active agent in CSF [ C u(CSF) ] is in equilibrium with its bound concentration in CSF [ C (CSF) ]. Movement of CNS‐active agents through both the BBB and the BCSFB can occur by passive diffusion (red arrows), active uptake (green arrows), or active efflux (blue arrows).
    View Image

Videos

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
   Abbott, N.J. 2004. Evidence for bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid: Significance for physiology and pathology. Neurochem. Int. 45:545‐552.
   Abbott, N.J. 2005. Dynamics of CNS barriers: Evolution, differentiation, and modulation. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 25:5‐23.
   Abbott, N.J., Khan, E.U., Rollinson, C.M., Reichel, A., Janigro, D., Dombrowski, S.M., Dobbie, M.S., and Begley, D.J. 2002. Drug resistance in epilepsy: The role of the blood–brain barrier. Novartis Foundation Symposium. 243:38‐47; discussion 47‐53, 180‐185.
   Abbott, N.J., Rönnbäck, L., and Hansson, E. 2006. Astrocyte–endothelial interactions at the blood–brain barrier. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7:41‐53.
   Abbott, N.J., Patabendige, A.A., Dolman, D.E., Yusof, S.R., and Begley, D.J. 2010. Structure and function of the blood‐brain barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 37:13‐25.
   Alavijeh, M.S., Chishty, M., Qaiser, M.Z., and Palmer, A.M. 2005. Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, the blood‐brain barrier, and central nervous system drug discovery. NeuroRx 2:554‐571.
   Alavijeh, M.S. and Palmer, A.M. 2010. Measurement of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of neuroactive compounds. Neurobiol. Dis. 37:38‐47.
   Aschner, M., Fitsanakis, V.A., dos Santos, A.P., Olivi, L., and Bressler, J.P. 2006. Blood‐brain barrier and cell‐cell interactions: Methods for establishing in vitro models of the blood‐brain barrier and transport measurements. Methods Mol. Biol. 341:1‐15.
   Banker, M.J. and Clark, T.H. 2008. Plasma/serum protein binding determinations. Curr. Drug Metab. 9:854‐859.
   Banks, W.A. and Erickson, M.A. 2010. The blood–brain barrier and immune function and dysfunction. Neurobiol. Dis. 37:26‐32.
   Barar, J., Gumbleton, M., Asadi, M., and Omidi, Y. 2010. Barrier functionality and transport machineries of human ECV304 cells. Med. Sci. Monitor 16:BR52‐BR60.
   Bartholomäus, I., Kawakami, N., Odoardi, F., Schläger, C., Miljkovic, D., Ellwart, J.W., Klinkert, W.E.F., Flügel‐Koch, C., Issekutz, T.B., Wekerle, H., and Flügel, A. 2009. Effector T cell interactions with meningeal vascular structures in nascent autoimmune CNS lesions. Nature 462:94‐98.
   Begley, D.J. 2004a. ABC transporters and the blood‐brain barrier. Curr. Pharmaceut. Design 10:1295‐1312.
   Begley, D.J. 2004b. Delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system: The problems and the possibilities. Pharmacol. Ther. 104:29‐45.
   Bickel, U., Yoshikawa, T., and Pardridge, W.M. 2001. Delivery of peptides and proteins through the blood–brain barrier. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 46:247‐279.
   Bolboacă, S.D. and Jäntschi, L. 2011. Predictivity approach for quantitative structure‐property models. Application for blood‐brain barrier permeation of diverse drug‐like compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12:4348‐4364.
   Bundgaard, C., Jørgensen, M., and Mørk, A. 2007. An integrated microdialysis rat model for multiple pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigations of serotonergic agents. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 55:214‐223.
   Bundgaard, C., Jensen, C.J.N., and Garmer, M. 2012. Species comparison of in vivo P‐glycoprotein‐mediated brain efflux using mdr1a‐deficient rats and mice. Drug Metab. Disposition 40:461‐466.
   Butt, A.M., Jones, H.C., and Abbott, N.J. 1990. Electrical resistance across the blood–brain barrier in anaesthetized rats: A developmental study. J. Physiol. 429:47‐62.
   Cecchelli, R., Dehouck, B., Descamps, L., Fenart, L., Buée‐Scherrer, V., Duhem, C., Lundquist, S., Rentfel, M., Torpier, G., and Dehouck, M.P. 1999. In vitro model for evaluating drug transport across the blood‐brain barrier. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 36:165‐178.
   Cecchelli, R., Berezowski, V., Lundquist, S., Culot, M., Renftel, M., Dehouck, M.‐P., and Fenart, L. 2007. Modelling of the blood–brain barrier in drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6:650‐661.
   Chaurasia, C.S., Müller, M., Bashaw, E.D., Benfeldt, E., Bolinder, J., Bullock, R., Bungay, P.M., DeLange, E.C.M., Derendorf, H., Elmquist, W.F., Hammarlund‐Udenaes, M., Joukhadar, C., Kellogg, D.L. Jr., Lunte, C.E., Nordstrom, C.H., Rollema, H., Sawchuk, R.J., Cheung, B.W.Y., Shah, V.P., Stahle, L., Ungerstedt, U., Welty, D.F., and Yeo, H. 2007. AAPS‐FDA workshop white paper: Microdialysis principles, application and regulatory perspectives. Pharmaceut. Res. 24:1014‐1025.
   Chefer, V.I., Thompson, A.C., Zapata, A., and Shippenberg, T.S. 2009. Overview of brain microdialysis. In Current Protocols in Neuroscience (C. Gerfen, A. Holmes, D. Sibley, P. Skolnick, and S. Wray, eds.) pp. 7.1.1‐7.1.28. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.
   Chen, L., Li, Y., Yu, H., Zhang, L., and Hou, T. 2012. Computational models for predicting substrates or inhibitors of P‐glycoprotein. Drug Discov. Today 17:343‐351.
   Chishty, M., Begley, D.J., Abbott, N.J., and Reichel, A. 2003. Functional characterisation of nucleoside transport in rat brain endothelial cells. Neuroreport 14:1087‐1090.
   Coisne, C., Dehouck, L., Faveeuw, C., Delplace, Y., Miller, F., Landry, C., Morissette, C., Fenart, L., Cecchelli, R., Tremblay, P., and Dehouck, B. 2005. Mouse syngenic in vitro blood–brain barrier model: A new tool to examine inflammatory events in cerebral endothelium. Lab. Invest. 85:734‐746.
   Copeland, R.A. 2010. The dynamics of drug‐target interactions: Drug‐target residence time and its impact on efficacy and safety. Exp. Opin. Drug Discovery 5:305‐310.
   Cserr, H.F. and Patlak, C.S. 1993. Secretion and bulk flow of interstitial fluid. In Physiology and Pharmacology of the Blood–Brain Barrier, Vol. 103 (M.W.B. Bradbury, ed.) pp. 245‐253. Springer, New York.
   Cunha‐Vaz, J., Bernardes, R., and Lobo, C. 2011. Blood‐retinal barrier. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 21:S3‐S9.
   Dallas, S., Miller, D.S., and Bendayan, R. 2006. Multidrug resistance‐associated proteins: Expression and function in the central nervous system. Pharmacol. Rev. 58:140‐161.
   Darvesh, A.S., Carroll, R.T., Geldenhuys, W.J., Gudelsky, G.A., Klein, J., Meshul, C.K., and Van der Schyf, C.J. 2011. In vivo brain microdialysis: Advances in neuropsychopharmacology and drug discovery. Exp. Opin. Drug Discov. 6:109‐127.
   de Lange, E.C. and Danhof, M. 2002. Considerations in the use of cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics to predict brain target concentrations in the clinical setting: Implications of the barriers between blood and brain. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 41:691‐703.
   Deane, R. and Bradbury, M.W. 1990. Transport of lead‐203 at the blood‐brain barrier during short cerebrovascular perfusion with saline in the rat. J. Neurochem. 54:905‐914.
   Dehouck, M.‐P., Méresse, S., Delorme, P., Fruchart, J.C., and Cecchelli, R. 1990. An easier, reproducible, and mass‐production method to study the blood–brain barrier in vitro. J. Neurochem. 54:1798‐1801.
   Deli, M.A., Ábrahám, C.S., Kataoka, Y., and Niwa, M. 2005. Permeability studies on in vitro blood–brain barrier models: Physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 25:59‐127.
   Demel, M.A., Krämer, O., Ettmayer, P., Haaksma, E.E., and Ecker, G.F. 2009. Predicting ligand interactions with ABC transporters in ADME. Chem. Biodivers. 6:1960‐1969.
   Dijk, S.N., Francis, P.T., Stratmann, G.C., and Bowen, D.M. 1995. NMDA‐induced glutamate and aspartate release from rat cortical pyramidal neurones: Evidence for modulation by a 5‐HT1A antagonist. Br. J. Pharmacol. 115:1169‐1174.
   Dombrowski, S.M., Desai, S.Y., Marroni, M., Cucullo, L., Goodrich, K., Bingaman, W., Mayberg, M.R., Bengez, L., and Janigro, D. 2001. Overexpression of multiple drug resistance genes in endothelial cells from patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 42:1501‐1506.
   Doran, A., Obach, R.S., Smith, B.J., Hosea, N.A., Becker, S., Callegari, E., Chen, C., Chen, X., Choo, E., Cianfrogna, J., Cox, L.M., Gibbs, J.P., Gibbs, M.A., Hatch, H., Hop, C.E.C.A., Kasman, I.N., LaPerle, J., Liu, J., Liu, X., Logman, M., Maclin, D., Nedza, F.M., Nelson, F., Olson, E., Rahematpura, S., Raunig, D., Rogers, S., Schmidt, K., Spracklin, D.K., Szewc, M., Troutman, M., Tseng, E., Tu, M., Van Deusen, J.W., Venkatakrishnan, K., Walens, G., Wang, E.Q., Wong, D., Yasgar, A.S., and Zhang, C. 2005. The impact of P‐glycoprotein on the disposition of drugs targeted for indications of the central nervous system: Evaluation using the MDR1A/1B knockout mouse model. Drug Metab. Disposition 33:165‐174.
   Elmeliegy, M.A., Carcaboso, A.M., Tagen, M., Bai, F., and Stewart, C.F. 2011. Role of ATP‐binding cassette and solute carrier transporters in erlotinib CNS penetration and intracellular accumulation. Clin. Cancer Res. 17:89‐99.
   Engelhardt, B. 2008. Immune cell entry into the central nervous system: Involvement of adhesion molecules and chemokines. J. Neurol. Sci. 274:23‐26.
   Engelhardt, B. and Ransohoff, R.M. 2005. The ins and outs of T‐lymphocyte trafficking to the CNS: Anatomical sites and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol. 26:485‐495.
   Engelhardt, B., Kempe, B., Merfeld‐Clauss, S., Laschinger, M., Furie, B., Wild, M.K., and Vestweber, D. 2005. P‐selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 is not required for the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL and C57BL/6 mice. J. Immunol. 175:1267‐1275.
   Fridén, M., Gupta, A., Antonsson, M., Bredberg, U., and Hammarlund‐Udenaes, M. 2007. In vitro methods for estimating unbound drug concentrations in the brain interstitial and intracellular fluids. Drug Metab. Disposition 35:1711‐1719.
   Fridén, M., Bergström, F., Wan, H., Rehngren,
推荐方法

Copyright ©2007 ANTPedia, All Rights Reserved

京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号