ForewordThe Working Group of the IEEE Switchgear Committee@ which prepared this guide@ consisted of the following persons at the time of Standards Board approval:L. W. Gaussa@ Sr.@ ChairR. N. CarsonA. P. Colaiaco*C. E. Corley*K. I. GrayR. W. Long*J. A. ManeatisW. C. McKayT. P. McNamara*J. J. Mikos*G. O. PerkinsG. LaguensW. N. RothenbuhlerK. M. Skreiner*S. H. TelanderD. R. WebsterC. E. Zanzie**Previous members of the Working Group who contributed to the writing of this standard.When the IEEE Standards Board approved this standard on November 9@ 1989@ it had the following membership:Dennis Bodson@ ChairMarco W. Migliaro@ Vice ChairAndrew G. Salem@ SecretaryArthur A. BlaisdellFletcher J. BuckleyAllen L. ClappJames M. DalyStephen R. DillonDonald C. FleckensteinEugene P. FogartyJay Forster*Thomas L. HannanKenneth D. HendrixTheodore W. Hissey@ Jr.John W. HorchDavid W. HutchinsFrank D. KirschnerFrank C. KitzantidesJoseph L. Koepfinger*Michael LawlerEdward LohseJohn E. May@ Jr.Lawrence V. McCallL. Bruce McClungDonald T. Michael*Richard E. MosherStig NilssonL. John RankineGary S. RobinsonDonald W. ZipseScopeThis guide may be used by equipment manufacturers to establish procedures that will yield data to substantiate performance claims or by equipment users to evaluate and verify performance of representative devices and assemblies as part of an overall qualification effort.As used in this guide@ the word switchgear shall mean metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies with the requirements as defined in ANSI/IEEE C37.20.1-1987@ Standard for Metal-Enclosed Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breaker Switchgear [4]@ ANSI/IEEE C37.20.2-1987@ Standard for Metal-Clad and Station-Type Cubicle Switchgear [5]@ and ANSI/IEEE C37.20.3-1987@ Standard for Metal-Enclosed Interrupter Switchgear [6]. By definition@ metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies include metal-clad switchgear@ station-type cubicle switchgear@ metalenclosed interrupter switchgear@ and low-voltage power circuit breaker switchgear. This guide does not cover metalenclosed bus or control switchboards.Metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies fall into the category of complex devices as described in ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10]. Therefore@ basic seismic qualification is dependent on test data. Switchgear assemblies have many different types and arrangements of devices and components. It is neither practical nor necessary to test each unique configuration of devices and components@ nor is it necessary to test a given configuration for every possible seismic environment. However@ it is essential that each switchgear assembly used in Class 1E applications be seismically qualified for its environment@ and this qualification must be based on data obtained by test. Analysis may be used in data reduction@ reconciling response spectra@ and evaluation of changes.A method of combined test and analysis may also be used in justifying seismic qualification of equipment similar to the tested sample.Devices@ such as relays@ instruments@ circuit breakers@ and control switches@ are qualified for use on a switchgear assembly by demonstrating that their seismic withstand capabilities as determined by seismic tests equal or exceed the seismic environment of the location on the switchgear assembly where they will be mounted.Three standard Generic Response Spectra (GRS) have been developed that cover the seismic requirements for most locations. The GRS have been developed as a composite of a number of Required Response Spectra (RRS) proposed for nuclear generating stations throughout the US@ and cover approximately 75% of the locations sampled. The GRS establish standard seismic ratings@ and any switchgear assembly that has been demonstrated by test to have met a rating will therefore be seismically qualified for any user application where the RRS is enveloped by the GRS.If the standard GRS do not apply to a particular application@ specific seismic information must be furnished by the user and used as the basis for qualification.