PUBL 937-A-2005

Study to Establish Relations for the Relative Strength of API 650 Cone Roof Roof-to-Shell and Shell-to-Bottom Joints


 

 

非常抱歉,我们暂时无法提供预览,您可以试试: 免费下载 PUBL 937-A-2005 前三页,或者稍后再访问。

如果您需要购买此标准的全文,请联系:

点击下载后,生成下载文件时间比较长,请耐心等待......

 

标准号
PUBL 937-A-2005
发布日期
2005年08月01日
实施日期
2005年08月25日
废止日期
中国标准分类号
/
国际标准分类号
/
发布单位
API - American Petroleum Institute
引用标准
78
适用范围
Introduction This report documents an evaluation of the relative strengths of the roof-to-shell and shell-to-bottom joints in API 650 cone roof tanks. This information is supplied to the American Petroleum Institute as background material for development of design rules that govern frangible roof joints for API 650 tanks. API 650 (American Petroleum Institute@ 2001) provides design criteria for fluid storage tanks used to store flammable products. Due to filling and emptying of the tanks@ the vapor above the product surface inside the tank may be within its flammability limits. Ignition of this vapor can cause sudden over-pressurization and can lead to the catastrophic loss of tank integrity. To prevent shell or bottom failure@ the rules in API 650 are intended to ensure that the frangible roof-to-shell joint fails before failure occurs in the tank shell or the shell-to-bottom joint. Failure of the frangible roof-to-shell joint provides a large venting area and reduces the pressure in the tank. Although the criteria in API 650 function well for large tanks@ small tanks designed to the API 650 rules have not always functioned as intended. Morgenegg@ 1978@ provides a description of a 20 foot diameter by 20 foot tall tank in which the shell-to-bottom failed. Other such failures have been noted by API@ providing the incentive for this study. As presently written@ the API 650 rules do not address the strength of the shell-to-bottom joint directly. Instead@ the present rule is intended to ensure that the roof-to-shell joint fails at a pressure lower than that required to lift the weight of tank. It is assumed that with no uplift@ the shell-to-bottom joint will not have significant additional loads and that failure of the shell-to-bottom will be avoided. A study of roof-to-shell joint failure (Swenson@ et al.@ 1996) showed that for large tanks@ the roof-to-shell joint did indeed fail before tank uplift@ but that for smaller tanks uplift would occur before roof-to-shell joint failure. Since uplift occurs for small tanks@ this increases the possibility of shell-to-bottom joint failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relative strengths of the roof-to-shell and shell-to-bottom joints@ with the goal of providing suggestions for frangible roof design criteria applicable to smaller tanks.




Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号