13.020.30 环境影响评定 标准查询与下载

T/CACE 053-2022 多元复合固废循环利用技术综合验证导则

1  范围 2  规范性引用文件 3  术语和定义 4  验证边界要求　 5  验证流程　 附录A（资料性）技术验证指标清单样表　 附录B（资料性）资源验证指标清单样表　 附录C（资料性）环境验证指标清单样表　

Guidelines for Comprehensive Verification of Multiple Composite Solid Waste Recycling Technology

T/CACE 052-2022 多元复合固废工业化循环利用绩效评价技术通则

1 范围　 2 规范性引用文件　 3 术语和定义　 4 评价总则　 5 评价目的与功能单位　 6 数据收集与审核　 7 评价指标　 8 评价方法　 9 评价报告　 10 评价结果的应用　

General rules of performance evaluation technology for multi-component composite solid waste industrialized recycling

DB51/T 1492-2022 农区畜禽养殖负荷风险评估技术规程

本文件规定了畜禽粪尿产生量、养分产生量、养殖负荷的计算及其风险预警等级等要求。 本文件适用于农区畜禽养殖负荷的风险评估。

Technical regulations for risk assessment of livestock and poultry breeding load in agricultural areas

T/TJ 0001-2022 村镇建设生态环境影响遥感评价导则

本导则提供了基于遥感技术评价县域范围内村镇建设生态环境影响的流程和方法，包括评价的基本流程、评价时点和空间坐标系要求、数据要求和预处理方法、村镇生态环境状况遥感综合指数体系及计算方法，并明确了评价报告编制的主要内容、基础资料汇编与数据库以及成果图件编制的要求。

Guidelines for Remote Sensing Assessment of Ecological Environment Impact of Village and Town Construction

ASTM E1528-22 有限环境尽职调查的标准实践:交易筛选过程

1.1 Purpose—The purpose of this practice is to define a good practice in the United States of America for conducting a transaction screen2 for a subject property where the user wishes to conduct limited environmental due diligence (that is, less than a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment). If the driving force behind the environmental due diligence is a desire to qualify for one of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs), this practice should not be applied. Instead, the ASTM E1527: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process or ASTM E2247: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property may be used. 1.1.1 This practice will not satisfy the requirement to conduct all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the subject property consistent with “generally accepted good commercial and customary standards and practices” as defined in 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B) to qualify for one of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs). Users who desire to conduct environmental due diligence to qualify for one of the CERCLA LLPs should conduct assessment activities in conformity with “Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries,” 40 C.F.R. Part 312; ASTM E1527: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process or ASTM E2247: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property. 1.2 An evaluation of business environmental risk associated with a parcel of commercial real estate may necessitate investigation beyond that identified in this practice. See Sections 1.4 and 9. 1.2.1 Potential Environmental Concerns—The goal of conducting a transaction screen is to identify potential environmental concerns as defined in 3.2.36. 1.2.2 Other Federal, State, and Local Environmental Laws—This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws. Users are cautioned that federal, state, and local laws may impose environmental assessment obligations that are beyond the scope of this practice. In some cases, government agencies permit the use of this practice in connection with their programs but sometimes impose additional requirements going beyond this practice. Users should also be aware that there are likely to be other legal obligations with regard to chemicals of concern discovered on property that are not addressed in this practice and may pose risks of civil or criminal sanctions or both for noncompliance. 1.3 Objective—The objective guiding the development of this practice is to facilitate standardized transaction screens. 1.3.1 Note of Caution—The user should be cautious in applying this practice to properties with known current or historical handling of chemicals of concern. See Note 1. 1.3.2 Potentially Appropriate Uses—This practice may be especially appropriate for properties in rural, non-industrial, or undeveloped locations or, subject to the criteria of a lending institution, in connection with a financing of properties that are expected to have few environmental concerns. NOTE 1—In general, a transaction screen assessment is not suitable for purposes of evaluating environmental conditions of a property having activities that use, handle, store, or dispose of large volumes of chemicals, either currently or in the past. Such activities include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, vehicle fueling, dry cleaning, metal plating and finishing, circuit board manufacturing, junkyard, and landfill activities which would prompt the need for further inquiry. Refuting the presumption of a potential environmental concern on such properties normally requires the specialized knowledge and experience of an environmental professional completing a detailed environmental assessment such as a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. 1.4 Considerations Beyond the Scope—The use of this practice is strictly limited to the scope set forth in this section. 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E50 on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and Corrective Action and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E50.02 on Real Estate Assessment and Management. Current edition approved May 1, 2022. Published July 2022. Originally approved in 1993. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as E1528– 14ɛ1 . DOI: 10.1520/ E1528-22. 2 Whenever terms defined in 3.2 or described in 3.3 are used in this practice, they are in italics. Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. 1 Section 9 of this practice identifies, for informational purposes, certain environmental conditions (not an all-inclusive list) that may exist on a subject property that are beyond the scope of this practice but may warrant consideration by parties to a commercial real estate transaction. The need to include an investigation of any such conditions in the scope of services should be evaluated based upon, among other factors, the nature of the subject property and the reasons for performing the assessment (for example, a more comprehensive evaluation of business environmental risk) and should be agreed upon as additional services beyond the scope of this practice prior to initiation of the Transaction Screen Process. 1.5 Organization of This Practice—This practice has several parts and one appendix. Section 1 is the Scope. Section 2 refers to other ASTM standards in the Referenced Documents. Section 3, Terminology, has definitions of terms not unique to this practice, descriptions of terms unique to this practice, and acronyms. Section 4 is Significance and Use of this practice. Section 5 is the Introduction to the Transaction Screen Process. Section 6 sets forth the Transaction Screen Questionnaire itself. Sections 7 and 8 contain the Guide to the Transaction Screen Questionnaire and its various parts. Section 9 provides additional information regarding non-scope considerations. See 1.4. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process

IEC TS 62933-2-2:2022 电能存储（EES）系统第2-2部分:单元参数和试验方法应用和性能试验

Electrical energy storage (EES) systems - Part 2-2: Unit parameters and testing methods - Application and performance testing

T/SACE 026-2022 热处理工艺资源环境负荷数据测量方法

4.1　本标准适用的热处理工艺类型主要包括正火、退火、淬火、回火；热处理工艺设备主要包括真空退火炉、工业电阻炉（台车式）、箱式回火炉、井式回火炉。关键热处理工艺参数主要包括加热温度、加热时间、保温时间。 4.2　资源环境负荷测量选取的要素主要包括能源消耗、资源消耗、环境排放以及职业健康数据。其中，能源消耗主要包括电能、天然气的消耗。资源消耗主要包括淬火液、淬火油、水的消耗。环境排放主要包括粉尘、挥发性有机物（VOC）、气态污染物。职业健康数据主要包括噪声、温度。

Data measurement method of heat treatment process resources and environmental load

T/CSF 002-2022 露天矿山植被重建生态效益评估指南

本文件规定了露天矿山植被重建生态效益评估的指标体系，指标计算和综合评估的方法。

Guidelines for ecological benefit assessment of vegetation restoration in open-pit mine

T/CAQI 258-2022 化工园区化学品人体健康风险评估技术指南

暴露情景确认、职业暴露量计算、环境间接暴露量计算、消费者暴露量计算等。

Technical guidelines for human health risk assessment of chemicals in chemical industry parks

DB14/T 2447-2022 建设项目环境影响后评价技术导则 生态影响类

本文件规定了生态影响类建设项目环境影响后评价的一般性原则、工作程序、评价范围、评价方法、评价标准、评价内容及相关要求。 本文件适用于矿山开采、交通运输、天然气开采、水利水电等生态影响类建设项目环境影响后评价。其他生态影响类建设项目环境影响后评价可参照执行。

Technical guidelines for post-evaluation of environmental impact of construction projects Ecological impact category

T/CCAA 38-2021 私人小客车合乘出行项目温室气体减排量评估技术规范

本文件参考了国际通用的温室气体减排量计算工具和国家发展改革委备案的自愿减排项目方法学，提出了私人小客车合乘出行项目的温室气体减排量评估技术规范，为核算私人小客车合乘出行项目的温室气体减排量提供了科学依据。

Technical specifications for greenhouse gas emission reduction for private car ride sharing project

ASTM E1527-21 环境现场评估的标准实施规程:第一阶段环境现场评估过程

1.1 Purpose—The purpose of this practice is to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment2 of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. § 9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customary standards and practices as defined at 42 U.S.C. § 9601(35)(B). (See Appendix X1 for an outline of CERCLA’s liability and defense provisions.) Controlled substances are not included within the scope of this practice. Persons conducting an environmental site assessment as part of an EPA Brownfields Assessment and Characterization Grant awarded under CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9604(k)(2)(B) must include controlled substances as defined in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 802) within the scope of the assessment investigations to the extent directed in the terms and conditions of the specific grant or cooperative agreement. Additionally, an evaluation of business environmental risk (BER) associated with a parcel of commercial real estate may necessitate investigation beyond that identified in this practice (see 1.4 and Section 13). 1.1.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions—The goal of the processes established by this practice is to identify recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental condition means (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. A de minimis condition is not a recognized environmental condition. 1.1.2 Petroleum Products—Petroleum products are included within the scope of this practice because they are of concern with respect to commercial real estate and current custom and usage is to include an inquiry into the presence of petroleum products when doing an environmental site assessment of commercial real estate. Inclusion of petroleum products within the scope of this practice is not based upon the applicability, if any, of CERCLA to petroleum products. 1.1.3 CERCLA Requirements Other Than Appropriate Inquiries—This practice does not address whether requirements in addition to all appropriate inquiries have been met in order to qualify for the LLPs (for example, the duties specified in 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(b)(3)(a) and (b) and cited in Appendix X1, including the continuing obligation not to impede the integrity and effectiveness of activity and use limitations [AULs], or the duty to take reasonable steps to prevent releases, or the duty to comply with legally required release reporting obligations). 1.1.4 Other Federal, State, and Local Environmental Laws—This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws other than the all appropriate inquiries provisions of the LLPs. Users are cautioned that federal, state, and local laws may impose environmental assessment obligations that are beyond the scope of this practice. Users should also be aware that there are likely to be 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E50 on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and Corrective Action and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E50.02 on Real Estate Assessment and Management. Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2021. Published November 2021. Originally approved in 1993. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as E1527 – 13. DOI: 10.1520/E1527-21. 2 All definitions, descriptions of terms, and acronyms are defined in Section 3. Whenever terms defined in 3.2 are used in this practice, they are in italics. Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. 1 8QLYHUVLW\RI7RURQWR 8QLYHUVLW\RI7RURQWR SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG 'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\ &RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW O DOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG )UL'HF*07 other legal obligations with regard to hazardous substances or petroleum products discovered in, on, or at the subject property that are not addressed in this practice and that may pose risks of civil and/or criminal sanctions for noncompliance.3 1.1.5 Documentation—The scope of this practice includes research and reporting requirements that support the user’s ability to qualify for the LLPs. As such, sufficient documentation of all sources, records, and resources utilized in conducting the inquiry required by this practice must be provided in the written report (refer to 8.1.9 and 12.2). 1.2 Objectives—Objectives guiding the development of this practice are (1) to synthesize and put in writing good commercial and customary practice for environmental site assessments for commercial real estate; (2) to facilitate high quality, standardized environmental site assessments; (3) to provide a practical and reasonable standard practice for conducting all appropriate inquiries; and (4) to clarify an industry standard for all appropriate inquiries in an effort to guide legal interpretation of the LLPs. 1.3 Units—The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.4 Considerations beyond Scope—The use of this practice is strictly limited to the scope set forth in this section. Section 13 of this practice identifies, for informational purposes, certain environmental conditions (not an all-inclusive list) that may exist at a subject property that are beyond the scope of this practice, but may warrant consideration by parties to a commercial real estate transaction. The need to include an investigation of any such conditions in the environmental professional’s scope of services should be evaluated based upon, among other factors, the nature of the subject property and the reasons for performing the assessment (for example, a more comprehensive evaluation of business environmental risk) and should be agreed upon between the user and environmental professional as additional services beyond the scope of this practice before initiation of the environmental site assessment process. 1.5 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project’s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process

BS PD IEC TR 62933-200:2021 电能储存（EES）系统 机组参数和测试方法 位于带光伏的电动汽车充电站的电能存储（EES）系统的案例研究

Electrical energy storage (EES) systems. Unit parameters and testing methods. Case study of electrical energy storage (EES) systems located in EV charging station with PV

T/QMIS 001-2021 微生物菌群在河微生物菌群在河湖微生态修复应用中的安全性评估技术导则

本标准规定了微生物菌群在河湖微生态修复应用中的安全评估原则、程序、内容和方法。 本标准适用于采用微生物菌群进行水质提升、底泥改良及环境微生物群落多样性维持与恢复的河湖生态修复。

Technical Guideline for Safety Assessment of Application of Microbial Consortia on Ecological Remediation of Rivers and Lakes

DB4112/T 298-2021 城镇污水处理厂突发环境事件风险分级方法

Risk classification method for environmental emergencies in urban sewage treatment plants

PN-EN IEC 62933-5-2-2020-07 P 电能存储（EES）系统 第 5-2 部分：电网集成 EES 系统的安全要求 基于电化学的系统（IEC 62933-5-2:2020）

Electrical energy storage (EES) systems--Part 5-2: Safety requirements for grid-integrated EES systems--Electrochemical-based systems (IEC 62933-5-2:2020)

DB32/T 4079-2021 浅水湖泊水源地水生态安全评价指南

本文件适用于县级以上浅水湖泊水源地水生态安全状况评价，浅水型平原人工湖水源地的评价可参照执行。

Guidelines for Water Ecological Security Assessment of Shallow Lake Water Sources

PN-EN ISO 14091-2021-08 E 适应气候变化 脆弱性、影响和风险评估指南（ISO 14091:2021）

Adaptation to climate change -- Guidelines on vulnerability, impacts and risk assessment (ISO 14091:2021)

T/CI 024-2021 城市群生态安全协同会诊技术规范

3  协同会诊指标体系　2 3.1 协同会诊指标选取原则　2 3.2 协同会诊指标体系的构成　2 3.3 协同会诊指标的计算　3 3.4 协同会诊指标权重赋值　5 4  协同会诊技术过程　6 4.1 协同会诊数据采集　6 4.2 原始数据校验流程与方法　6 4.3 数据分析流程与方法　6 4.4 数据采集空间范围和时间要求　6 4.5 协同会诊指标的量化识别　6 4.6 协同会诊指标权重计算方法　6 4.7 协同会诊指数计算方法与分级标准　7 5  协同会诊结果检验　8 2.1 生态安全压力（ecological security pressure）：表示人类活动给生态安全带来的负荷，包含人口承载、人口增长、城镇扩张、经济结构、社会发展、水资源保护、生态安全保护、经济强度、能源消费等体现生态安全压力的指标。 2.2 生态安全状态（ecological security status）：表示研究区域狭义的生态安全状态，包含能源消费、水资源、碳排放、生态破坏、城镇绿化、湿地水域、工业环境、大气环境等八大生态安全状态。 2.3 生态安全响应（ecological security response）：表示人类面临生态安全问题时所采取的对策，包含产业、经济、生活、工业、社会、水资源、科技等七大生态安全响应。 2.4 主观赋权法（subjective weighting method）：根据专家专业知识经验主观研判指标权重，决策结果存在一定的主观随意性，如层次分析法（AHP），专家调查法（Delphi）等。 2.5 客观赋权法（objective weighting method）：即依据原始数据之间的关系和数理特性计算权重，具有较强的客观性与数理依据，但是缺乏对指标本身的概念分析，如变异系数、熵值法等。 2.6 正向指标（positive indicator）：在多指标综合评价中，指标值越大评价越好，称为正向指标。 2.7 逆向指标（reverse indicator）：在多指标综合评价中，指标值越小评价越好，称为逆向指标。 2.8 城市群（Urban Agglomeration）：指在特定地域范围内，以1个超大、特大或辐射带动功能强的大城市为核心，由至少3个以上都市圈（区）或大城市为基本构成单元，依托发达的交通通信等基础设施网络，所形成的空间组织紧凑、经济联系紧密、并最终实现高度一体化的城市组合体。 2.9 共线性（multicollinearity）：指线性回归模型中的解释变量之间由于存在精确相关关系或高度相关关系而使模型估计失真或难以估计准确。 2.10 方差膨胀因子（variance Inflation Factor）：是指解释变量之间存在多重共线性时的方差与不存在多重共线性时的方差之比。方差膨胀因子越大，显示共线性越严重。 2.11 拮抗（antagonism）：是一种物质过程被另一种过程所阻抑的现象。 2.12 因子分析：在原有变量之间具有较强的相关关系时，因子分析能从原有众多变量中综合出少量具有代表意义的因子变量。 2.13 KMO检验（Kaiser Meyer Olkin measure of sampling adequacy）：是SPSS提供判断原始变量是否适合做因子分析的统计检验方法之一，该值比较观测到原始变量间的相关系数和偏相关系数的大小。较大的KMO值表明适合进行因子分析。 2.14 Bartlett球形检验（Bartlett spherical test）：主要用于检验数据的分布，以及各个变量间的独立情况。

Technical Specification for Collaborative Consultation on Ecological Security in Urban Agglomerations

BS ISO 23732:2021 海洋技术 海洋环境影响评估 小型动物群落观察通用方案

Marine technology. Marine environment impact assessment (MEIA). General protocol for observation of meiofaunal community