17.120.10 封闭管道中流量的测量 标准查询与下载

JB/T 14241-2022 一体式阀式孔板流量计

Integrated valve orifice flow meter

JB/T 14240-2022 三转子流量计

Three rotor flowmeter

ASTM D3764-22 工艺流分析仪系统性能验证的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice describes procedures and methodologies based on the statistical principles of Practice D6708 to validate whether the degree of agreement between the results produced by a total analyzer system (or its subsystem), versus the results produced by an independent test method that purports to measure the same property, meets user-specified requirements. This is a performance-based validation, to be conducted using a set of materials that are not used a priori in the development of any correlation between the two measurement systems under investigation. A result from the independent test method is herein referred to as a Primary Test Method Result (PTMR). 1.1.1 The degree of agreement described in 1.1 can be either for PPTMRs and PTMRs measured on the same materials, or for PPTMRs measured on basestocks and PTMRs measured on these same basestocks after constant level additivation. 1.1.2 In some cases, a two-step procedure is employed. In the first step, the analyzer and PTM are applied to the measurement of the same blendstock material. If the analyzer employed in Step 1 is a multivariate spectrophotometric analyzer, then Practice D6122 is used to access the agreement between the PPTMRs and the PTMRs for this first step. Otherwise, this practice is used to compare the PPTMRs to the PTMRs measured for this blendstock to determine the degree of agreement. In a second step, the PPTMRs produced in Step 1 are used as inputs to a second model that predicts the results obtained when the PTM is applied to the analysis of the finished blended product. Since this second step does not use analyzer readings, the validation of the second step is done independently. Step 2 is only performed on valid Step 1 results. Note that the second model might accommodate variable levels or multiple material additions to the blendstock. 1.2 This practice assumes any correlation necessary to mitigate systemic biases between the analyzer system and PTM have been applied to the analyzer results. See Guide D7235 for procedures for establishing such correlations. 1.3 This practice assumes any modeling techniques employed have the necessary tuning to mitigate systemic biases between the analyzer PPTMR and PTMR have been applied to the model results. Model form and tuning is not covered by this practice, only the validation of the model output. 1.4 This practice requires that both the primary method against which the analyzer is compared to, and the analyzer system under investigation, are in statistical control. Practices described in Practice D6299 should be used to ensure this condition is met. 1.5 This practice applies if the process stream analyzer system and the primary test method are based on the same measurement principle(s), or, if the process stream analyzer system uses a direct and well-understood measurement principle that is similar to the measurement principle of the primary test method. This practice also applies if the process stream analyzer system uses a different measurement technology from the primary test method, provided that the calibration protocol for the direct output of the analyzer does not require use of the PTMRs (see Case 1 in Note 1). 1.6 This practice does not apply if the process stream analyzer system utilizes an indirect or mathematically modeled measurement principle such as chemometric or multivariate analysis techniques where PTMRs are required for the chemometric or multivariate model development. Users should refer to Practice D6122 for detailed validation procedures for these types of analyzer systems (see Case 2 in Note 1). NOTE 1—For example, for the measurement of benzene in spark ignition fuels, comparison of a Mid-Infrared process analyzer system based on Test Method D6277 to a Test Method D3606 gas chromatography primary test method would be considered Case 1, and this practice would apply. For each sample, the Mid-Infrared spectrum is converted into a single analyzer result using methodology (Test Method D6277) that is independent of the primary test method (Test Method D3606). However, when the same analyzer uses a multivariate model to correlate the measured Mid-Infrared spectrum to Test Method D3606 reference values using the methodology of Practice E1655, it is considered Case 2 and Practice D6122 applies. In this case 2 example, the direct output of the analyzer is the spectrum, and the conversion of this multivariate output to an analyzer result require use of Practice D6122, hence it is not independent of the primary test method. 1.7 Performance Validation is conducted by calculating the precision and bias of the differences between results from the analyzer system (or subsystem) after the application of any necessary correlation, (such results are herein referred to as Predicted Primary Test Method Results (PPTMRs)), versus the PTMRs for the same sample set. Results used in the calculation are for samples that are not used in the development of the correlation. The calculated precision and bias are statistically compared to user-specified requirements for the analyzer system application. 1.7.1 For analyzers used in product release or product quality certification applications, the precision and bias requirement for the degree of agreement are typically based on the site or published precision of the Primary Test Method. NOTE 2—In most applications of this type, the PTM is the specificationcited test method. 1.7.2 This practice does not describe procedures for establishing precision and bias requirements for analyzer system applications. Such requirements must be based on the criticality of the results to the intended business application and on contractual and regulatory requirements. The user must establish precision and bias requirements prior to initiating the validation procedures described herein. 1.8 Two procedures for validation are described: the line sample procedure and the validation reference material (VRM) injection procedure. 1.9 Only the analyzer system or subsystem downstream of the VRM injection point or the line sample extraction point is being validated by this practice. 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D02.25 on Performance Assessment and Validation of Process Stream Analyzer Systems. Current edition approved April 1, 2022. Published June 2022. Originally approved in 1980. Last previous edition approved in 2019 as D3764 – 19. DOI: 10.1520/D3764-22. D3764 − 22 2 1.10 The line sample procedure is limited to applications where material can be safely withdrawn from the sampling point of the analyzer unit without significantly altering the property of interest. 1.10.1 The line sample procedure is the primary option for when the validation is for (2b) materials including effect from additional treatment to the material. 1.11 Validation information obtained in the application of this practice is applicable only to the type and property range of the materials used to perform the validation. 1.12 Two types of validation are described: General Validation, and Level Specific Validation. These are typically conducted at installation or after major maintenance once the system mechanical fitness-for-use has been established. 1.12.1 General Validation is based on the statistical principles and methodology of Practice D6708. In most cases, General Validation is preferred, but may not always be possible if the variation in validation materials is insufficient. General Validation will validate analyzer operation over a wider operating range than Level Specific Validation. 1.12.2 When the variation in available validation materials is insufficient to satisfy the requirements of Practice D6708, a Level Specific Validation is done to validate analyzer operation over a limited range. 1.12.3 The validation outcome are considered valid only within the range covered by the validation material Data from several different Validations (general or level-specific) can potentially be combined for use in a General Validation. 1.13 Procedures for the continual validation of system performance are described. These procedures are typically applied at a frequency commensurate with the criticality of the application. 1.14 This practice does not address procedures for diagnosing causes of validation failure. 1.15 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.16 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Standard Practice for Validation of the Performance of Process Stream Analyzer Systems

ASTM D7808-22 在工艺流材料上测定工艺流分析仪现场精度的标准实施规程

1.1 This practice describes a procedure to quantify the site precision of a process analyzer via repetitive measurement of a single process sample over an extended time period. The procedure may be applied to multiple process samples to obtain site precision estimates at different property levels 1.1.1 The site precision is required for use of the statistical methodology of D6708 in establishing the correlation between analyzer results and primary test method results using Practice D7235. 1.1.2 The site precision is also required when employing the statistical methodology of D6708 to validate a process analyzer via Practices D3764 or D6122. 1.2 This practice is not applicable to in-line analyzers where the same quality control sample cannot be repetitively introduced. 1.3 This practice is meant to be applied to analyzers that measure physical properties or compositions. 1.4 This practice can be applied to any process analyzer system where the feed stream can be captured and stored in sufficient quantity with no stratification or stability concerns. 1.4.1 The captured stream sample introduction must be able to meet the process analyzer sample conditioning requirements, feed temperature and inlet pressure. 1.4.2 This practice is designed for use with samples that are single liquid phase, petroleum products whose vapor pressure, at sampling and sample storage conditions, is less than or equal to 110 kPa (16.0 psi) absolute and whose D86 final boiling point is less than or equal to 400 °C (752 °F). NOTE 1—The general procedures described in this practice may be applicable to materials outside this range, including multiphase materials, but such application may involve special sampling and safety considerations which are outside the scope of this practice. 1.5 The values for operating conditions are stated in SI units and are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are the historical inch-pound units for information only. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the 1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D02.25 on Performance Assessment and Validation of Process Stream Analyzer Systems. Current edition approved April 1, 2022. Published June 2022. Originally approved in 2012. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as D7808 – 18. DOI: 10.1520/D7808-22. *A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. 1 Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Standard Practice for Determining the Site Precision of a Process Stream Analyzer on Process Stream Material

JIS B 7556:2022 气体流量计的校准和检定试验

Calibration and proving test for gas flowmeter

DIN EN ISO 5167-3:2021 通过插入满载圆形横截面管道中的压差装置测量流体流量 第3部分：喷嘴和文丘里喷嘴（ISO 5167-3:2020）；德文版 EN ISO 5167-3:2020

This document specifies the geometry and method of use (installation and operating conditions) of nozzles and Venturi nozzles when they are inserted in a conduit running full to determine the flowrate of the fluid flowing in the conduit. This document also provides background inf

Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full - Part 3: Nozzles and Venturi nozzles (ISO 5167-3:2020); German version EN ISO 5167-3:2020

JB/T 13753-2021 平衡热量表

balance heat meter

KS B ISO 2975-7-2021 封闭管道中水流量的测量 示踪法 第7部分：使用放射性示踪剂的渡越时间法

Measurement of water flow in closed conduits－Tracer methods－Part 7：Transit time method using radioactive tracers

KS B 5640-2021 多路超声波流量计测试方法

Testing method of multi-path ultrasonic flowmeter

prEN 17694-2-2021 水文测量法 水监测设备的性能要求和测试程序 流量测定装置 第2部分：封闭管道仪表

Hydrometry - Performance requirements and test procedures for water monitoring equipment - Devices for the determination of flow - Part 2: Closed conduit instrumentation

T/ZBMS 001-2021 物联网膜式燃气表

主要技术内容:本文件规定了物联网膜式燃气表的范围、术语和定义、缩略语、工作条件、要求、检验方法、检验规则及标志、包装、运输、贮存。规定了计量特性、基表的结构和材料、耐环境温度、耐久性、计数器、机械封印、数据传输、远程阀控、阀门密封性、阀门门耐用性、静电放电抗扰度、射频电磁场辐射抗扰度、电压和电流、防爆性能、防护性能、机电转化误差、数据存储、电源欠压提示功能、断电保护功能、抗磁干扰、电子装置特性、抄读成功率、功能和存储信息、外观等项目的要求及检测方法。

IoT diaphragm gas meters

OENORM EN ISO 5167-1:2021 通过插入满载圆形横截面管道中的压差装置测量流体流量 第1部分：一般原则和要求（ISO/DIS 5167-1:2021）

Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full - Part 1: General principles and requirements (ISO/DIS 5167-1:2021)

OENORM EN ISO 5167-4:2021 通过插入满载圆形横截面管道中的压差装置测量流体流量 第4部分：文丘里管（ISO/DIS 5167-4:2021）

Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full - Part 4: Venturi tubes (ISO/DIS 5167-4:2021)

OENORM EN ISO 5167-2:2021 通过插入满管的圆形横截面管道中的压差装置测量流体流量 第2部分：孔板（ISO/DIS 5167-2:2021）

Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full - Part 2: Orifice plates (ISO/DIS 5167-2:2021)

OENORM EN ISO 9300:2021 通过临界流量喷嘴测量气体流量（ISO/DIS 9300:2021）

Measurement of gas flow by means of critical flow nozzles (ISO/DIS 9300:2021)

GSO ISO 5167-5:2021 通过插入完全运行的圆形横截面管道中的压差装置测量流体流量 第5部分：圆锥流量计

ISO 5167-5:2016 specifies the geometry and method of use (installation and operating conditions) of cone meters when they are inserted in a conduit running full to determine the flow rate of the fluid flowing in the conduit. As the uncertainty of an uncalibrated cone meter might be too high for a particular application, it might be deemed essential to calibrate the flow meter in accordance with Clause 7. ISO 5167-5:2016 also provides background information for calculating the flow rate and is applicable in conjunction with the requirements given in ISO 5167‑1. ISO 5167-5:2016 is applicable only to cone meters in which the flow remains subsonic throughout the measuring section and where the fluid can be considered as single-phase. Uncalibrated cone meters can only be used within specified limits of pipe size, roughness, β, and Reynolds number. This part of ISO 5167 is not applicable to the measurement of pulsating flow. It does not cover the use of uncalibrated cone meters in pipes sized less than 50 mm or more than 500 mm, or where the pipe Reynolds numbers are below 8 × 104 or greater than 1,2 × 107. A cone meter is a primary device which consists of a cone-shaped restriction held concentrically in the centre of the pipe with the nose of the cone upstream. The design of cone meter defined in this part of ISO 5167 has one or more upstream pressure tappings in the wall, and a downstream pressure tapping positioned in the back face of the cone with the connection to a differential pressure transmitter being a hole through the cone to the support bar, and then up through the support bar. Alternative designs of cone meters are available; however, at the time of writing, there is insufficient data to fully characterize these devices, and therefore, these meters shall be calibrated in accordance with Clause 7.

Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full — Part 5: Cone meters

GSO OIML R117-2:2021 除水以外的液体的动态测量系统 第2部分：计量控制和性能测试

1.1 This Standard specifies the metrological and technical requirements applicable to dynamic measuring systems for quantities (volume or mass) of liquids other than water subject to legal metrology controls. It also provides requirements for the approval of specific components of the measuring systems (meter, electronic calculator, etc.). 1.2 In principle, This Standard applies to all measuring systems fitted with a meter as defined in T.m.3 (continuous measurement), whatever be the measuring principle of the meters or their application, except  dynamic measuring devices and systems for cryogenic liquids (OIML R 81),  water meters for the metering of cold potable water and hot water (OIML R 49-1, R 49-2 and R 49-3), and  heat meters (OIML R 75-1, R 75-2 and R 75-3). 1.3 This Standard is not intended to prevent the development of new technologies. 1.4 National or international regulations are expected to clearly specify which measuring systems for liquids other than water are subject to legal metrology controls. For waste water measurement, it is up to the national authorities to decide whether the use of measuring systems conforming to This Standard is mandatory, and which accuracy class is required. 1.5 Part 2 of this Standard (OIML R 117-2) specifies the metrological controls and performance tests to meet the metrological and technical requirements of OIML R 117-1 for  the type evaluation of complete measuring systems, and  the type evaluation of constituent elements of a measuring system that are approved for separate type approval.

Dynamic measuring systems for liquids other than water – Part 2: Metrological controls and performance tests

GSO ISO 14511:2021 封闭管道中流体流量的测量 热质量流量计

This document gives guidelines for the specification, testing, inspection, installation, operation and calibration of thermal mass gas flowmeters for the metering of gases and gas mixtures. It is not applicable to measuring liquid mass flowrates using thermal mass flowmeters. This document is not applicable to hot wire and other hot film anemometers, also used in making point velocity measurements.

Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Thermal mass flowmeters

GSO OIML R117-3:2021 除水以外液体的动态测量系统 第3部分：测试报告格式

  Scope is not provided for this standard

Dynamic measuring systems for liquids other than water – Part 3: Test report format

GSO ISO/TR 3313:2021 封闭管道中流体流量的测量 流量脉动对流量测量仪器影响的指南

ISO/TR 3313:2018 defines pulsating flow, compares it with steady flow, indicates how it can be detected, and describes the effects it has on orifice plates, nozzles or Venturi tubes, turbine and vortex flowmeters when these devices are being used to measure fluid flow in a pipe. These particular flowmeter types feature in this document because they are amongst those types most susceptible to pulsation effects. Methods for correcting the flowmeter output signal for errors produced by these effects are described for those flowmeter types for which this is possible. When correction is not possible, measures to avoid or reduce the problem are indicated. Such measures include the installation of pulsation damping devices and/or choice of a flowmeter type which is less susceptible to pulsation effects. ISO/TR 3313:2018 applies to flow in which the pulsations are generated at a single source which is situated either upstream or downstream of the primary element of the flowmeter. Its applicability is restricted to conditions where the flow direction does not reverse in the measuring section but there is no restriction on the waveform of the flow pulsation. The recommendations within this document apply to both liquid and gas flows although with the latter the validity might be restricted to gas flows in which the density changes in the measuring section are small as indicated for the particular type of flowmeter under discussion.

Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Guidelines on the effects of flow pulsations on flow-measurement instruments