Q10 建材产品综合 标准查询与下载

DB21/T 1843-2010 混凝土养护剂应用技术规程

Technical specification for the application of concrete curing agent

SN/T 2716-2010 进出口建筑材料天然放射性核素检测方法

本标准规定了进出口建筑材料中天然放射性核素镭-226、钍-232、钾-40比活度的检测方法。 本标准适用于无机非金属建筑材料，如天然石材、砂、石灰、石膏、粘土、水泥、水泥制品、砖、瓦、混凝土、建筑陶瓷、含天然原料的涂料、含天然原料的墙体材料、用于建筑的工业废渣、含工业废渣的建筑材料等。

Determination of natural radionuclides in building materials for import and export

BS EN 15725:2010 在审议中的建筑产品和建筑构件性能扩展应用报告

This European Standard gives the procedures for preparing reports on the extended application process using the results of reaction to fire tests, fire resistance tests and external fire exposure to roof tests undertaken for fire classification of products and product families in accordance with the various parts of EN 13501. This standard makes reference to ‘extended application standards’ throughout; wherever this term is used it refers to either a standard prepared by CEN/TC 127 ‘Fire safety in buildings’ or the relevant product standard which includes information on extended application. In some cases, where a standard is not yet published, relevant bodies may issue recommendations for use by Notified Bodies in attestation procedures for CE marking under the Construction Products Directive (CPD), http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newapproach/nando/. The European system currently permits extended application rules to be included in technical specifications. CEN Technical Committees and EOTA Working groups producing these rules are asked to seek the guidance of CEN/TC 127 to ensure that their rules comply with standards prepared by CEN/TC 127. In cases where extended application rules in harmonised EN product standards and ETAs do not comply with standards prepared by CEN/TC 127 the CEN BT should be informed.

Extended application reports on the fire performance of construction products and building elements

ISO 1716:2010 产品耐火试验反应.总燃烧热力的测定(热值)

This International Standard specifies a method for the determination of the gross heat of combustion (QPCS) of products at constant volume in a bomb calorimeter.

Reaction to fire tests for products - Determination of the gross heat of combustion (calorific value)

ISO 1182:2010 产品对着火试验的反应.不可燃性试验

Reaction to fire tests for products - Non-combustibility test

DIN 52108:2010-05 无机非金属材料测试.根据Boehme使用砂轮的磨损试验.砂轮法

Testing of inorganic non-metallic materials - Wear test using the grinding wheel according to Böhme - Grinding wheel method

DIN EN ISO 10456:2010 建筑材料和制品.热性能申报值和设计值测定用列表式设计值和程序

This International Standard specifies methods for the determination of declared and design thermal values for thermally homogeneous building materials and products.

Building materials and products - Hygrothermal properties - Tabulated design values and procedures for determining declared and design thermal values (ISO 10456:2007 + Cor. 1:2009); German version EN ISO 10456:2007 + AC:2009

ASTM C227-10 水泥集料混合物的潜在碱反应性的标准试验方法(灰浆棒法)

Data correlating the results of tests performed using this test method with performance of cement-aggregate combinations in concrete in service, results of petrographic examination of aggregates (Guide C295), and results of tests for potential reactivity of aggregates by chemical methods have been published in Test Method C289 and should be consulted in connection with the use of results of tests performed using this test method as the basis for conclusions and recommendations concerning the use of cement-aggregate combinations in concrete. The results of tests performed using this method furnish information on the likelihood that a cement-aggregate combination is potentially capable of harmful alkali-silica reactivity with consequent deleterious expansion of concrete. Criteria to determine potential deleterious alkali-silica reactivity of cement-aggregate combinations from the results of this test method have been given in the Appendix of Specification C33. Insignificant expansion may result when potentially deleteriously reactive siliceous rocks are present in comparatively high proportion even when a high-alkali cement is used. This may occur because the alkali-silica reaction products are characterized by an alkali to silica ratio that is so low as to minimize uptake of water and swelling, or because of alkali leaching from the bars (see section on containers). Dolomitic aggregates that are deleteriously affected by the alkali-carbonate reaction when employed as course aggregate in concrete may not produce notable expansion in this test method. Also, significant expansion may occur rarely in the test for reasons other than alkali-aggregate reaction, particularly the presence of sulfates in the aggregate that produce a sulfate attack upon the cement paste, ferrous sulfides (pyrite, marcasite, or pyrrhotite) that oxidize and hydrate with the release of sulfate, and materials such as free lime (CaO) or free magnesia (MgO) in the cement or aggregate that progressively hydrate and carbonate. When expansions in excess of those given in the Appendix of Specification C33 are shown in results of tests performed using this test method, it is strongly recommended that supplementary information be developed to confirm that the expansion is actually due to alkali reactivity. Sources of such supplementary information include: (1) petrographic examination of the aggregate to determine if known reactive constituents are present; (2) examination of the specimens after tests to identify the products of alkali reactivity; and (3) tests of the aggregate for potential reactivity by chemical methods (Test Method C289). When it has been concluded from the results of tests performed using this test method and supplementary information as outlined that a given cement-aggregate combination should be considered potentially deleteriously reactive, additional studies may be appropriate to develop information on the potential reactivity of other combinations containing the same cement with other aggregates, the same aggregate with other cements, or the same cement-aggregate combination with a mineral admixture.1.1 This test method covers the determination of the susceptibility of cement-aggregate combinations to expansive reactions involving hydroxyl ions associated with the alkalies (sodium and potassium) by measurement of the increase (or decre......

Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar Method)

ASTM F2659-10 使用无损电子测湿计初步评估混凝土、石膏水泥以及其他楼板和砂浆层的标准指南

Moisture in concrete floor slabs affects the performance of flooring systems such as resilient, wood, and textile floor coverings and coatings. Manufacturers of such systems generally require moisture testing be performed before installation of coverings on floor slabs and screeds. The measurement of sub-surface comparative moisture condition in the upper 1.0 in. (25.4 mm) stratum of a concrete slab with a non-destructive moisture meter is one such method. Excessive moisture in floor slabs after installation can cause floor covering system failures such as delamination, bonding failure, deterioration of finish flooring and coatings, and microbial growth.1.1 This guide focuses on obtaining the comparative moisture condition within the upper 1.0 in. (25.4 mm) stratum in concrete, gypsum, anhydrite floor slabs and screeds for field tests. Due to the wide variation of material mixtures and additives used in floor slabs and screeds, this methodology may not be appropriate for all applications. See 1.2 through 1.8 and Section 11. Where appropriate or when specified use further testing as outlined in Test Methods F1869, F2170 or F2420 before installing a resilient floor covering. 1.2 This guide is intended for use to determine if there are moisture-related conditions existing on, or in, the floor slabs that could adversely impact the successful application and performance of resilient flooring products. 1.3 This guide may be used to aid in the diagnosis of failures of installed resilient flooring. 1.4 This guide is intended to be used in conjunction with meter manufacturer’s operation instructions and interpretive data where available. 1.5 Where possible, or when results need to be quantified use this standard guide to determine where additional testing such as Test Methods F1869, F2170, or F2420 as specified to characterize the floor slab and the test area environment for moisture, humidity and temperature conditions. 1.6 This guide may not be suitable for areas that have surface applied moisture migration systems, curing compounds or coatings that cannot be removed or cleaned off sufficiently to allow the moisture to move upwards through the slab. For a floor slab of 6 in. (150 mm) plus thickness, low porosity slabs, slabs with no vapor retarder installed, and slabs where the above surface environmental conditions can have a greater than normal influence on the moisture reduction gradient of the floor slab or screed, consider Test Method F2170 (below surface in situ rh method) as a more suitable test method under these circumstances. 1.7 This guide is not intended to provide quantitative results as a basis for acceptance of a floor for installation of moisture sensitive flooring finishes systems. Test Methods F1869, F2170, or F2420 provide quantitative information for determining if moisture levels are within specific limits......

Standard Guide for Preliminary Evaluation of Comparative Moisture Condition of Concrete, Gypsum Cement and Other Floor Slabs and Screeds Using a Non-Destructive Electronic Moisture Meter

ANSI/ASTM E105:2010 材料的概率抽样惯例

Practice for Probability Sampling of Materials

JGJ/T 191-2009 建筑材料术语标准　

本标准适用于建筑工程领域。

Standard for terminology of building materials

DIN SPEC 1096:2009 建筑产品.危险物质释放的评价.贸易壁垒;英语版本CEN/TR 15855-2009

Mandate M/366 of the European Commission to CEN, titled: "DEVELOPMENT OF HORIZONTAL STANDARDISED ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR HARMONISED APPROACHES RELATING TO DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE (CPD), emission to indoor air, soil, surface water and ground water", which created CEN/TC 351, required a number of technical reports (TRs) to assist in the process of standardisation. The first of these TRs was to establish the extent of or presence of technical barriers to trade resulting from requirements under Essential Requirement 3 (ER3), as perceived or experienced by manufacturers of construction products, demanded by EU Member States. Since the CPD (Council Directive 89/106/EEC of December 21, 1988 concerning construction products) is aiming to lift barriers to trade, there would be no point, in theory, in developing standards in CEN/TC 351 for the purpose of ER3 if no technical barriers to trade exist. However, the "Grounds" for this Mandate, given by the Commission, state: '... this standardisation mandate refers to products for which the two following conditions are fulfilled: a) the products are or risk to be subject to technical barriers to trade arising from regulated dangerous substances; b) the characteristics of the products regarding regulated dangerous substances influence the satisfaction by the construction works, in which they are to be incorporated in a permanent manner, of the essential requirements as laid down in article 3 of the CPD and set out in terms of objectives with regard to hygiene, health and the environment, in Annex 1 of the CPD. These works are subject to legislative, regulatory or administrative regulations of Member States covering such essential requirements specifically in the field of dangerous substances'.l Further, in Clause 7 of the "Execution of the Mandate" referring to the work programme of CEN, it states: 'It [the work programme] shall identify and cover all products or product families for which the three following conditions are fulfilled: -- European or national regulations are limiting or banning the emission or content (see IV.8) of dangerous substances; -- Existing or potential barriers to trade have been identified; -- Measurement/test methods for these specified regulated dangerous substances have already been developed and are used on a national or EU level. Considering point (a) in the "Grounds" for the Mandate it is stated that products "at risk"from technical barriers to trade are equally important to existing barriers to trade, and also in the above Clause 7, Execution of the Mandate, the second dash refers to "potential barriers" as well as established barriers. This makes the scope of the work wider than simply identifying existing technical barriers. The Mandate also specifically refers to 'technical' barriers to trade, and CEN is especially asked to consider in the Work Package the following TR: "Work Package 1 : technical reports: procedures for testing and testing schemes

Construction products - Assessment of release of dangerous substances - Barriers to trade; English version CEN/TR 15855:2009

JG/T 157-2009 建筑外墙用腻子

本标准规定了建筑外墙用腻子的要求、试验方法、检验规则及标志、包装和贮存等。 本标准适用于以水泥、聚合物粉末、合成树脂乳液等材料为主要粘结剂,配以填料、助剂等制成的用于普通外墙、外墙外保温等涂料底层外墙腻子。

Putty for exterior wall

BS PD CEN/TR 15855:2009 建材产品.危险物质的释放评估.贸易壁垒

Mandate M/366 of the European Commission to CEN, titled: “DEVELOPMENT OF HORIZONTAL STANDARDISED ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR HARMONISED APPROACHES RELATING TO DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE (CPD), emission to indoor air, soil, surface water and ground water”, which created CEN/TC 351, required a number of technical reports (TRs) to assist in the process of standardisation. The first of these TRs was to establish the extent of or presence of technical barriers to trade resulting from requirements under Essential Requirement 3 (ER3), as perceived or experienced by manufacturers of construction products, demanded by EU Member States. Since the CPD (Council Directive 89/106/EEC of December 21, 1988 concerning construction products) is aiming to lift barriers to trade, there would be no point, in theory, in developing standards in CEN/TC 351 for the purpose of ER3 if no technical barriers to trade exist. However, the “Grounds” for this Mandate, given by the Commission, state: ‘… this standardisation mandate refers to products for which the two following conditions are fulfilled: a) the products are or risk to be subject to technical barriers to trade arising from regulated dangerous substances; b) the characteristics of the products regarding regulated dangerous substances influence the satisfaction by the construction works, in which they are to be incorporated in a permanent manner, of the essential requirements as laid down in article 3 of the CPD and set out in terms of objectives with regard to hygiene, health and the environment, in Annex 1 of the CPD. These works are subject to legislative, regulatory or administrative regulations of Member States covering such essential requirements specifically in the field of dangerous substances'.1 Further, in Clause 7 of the “Execution of the Mandate” referring to the work programme of CEN, it states: ‘It [the work programme] shall identify and cover all products or product families for which the three following conditions are fulfilled:  European or national regulations are limiting or banning the emission or content (see IV.8) of dangerous substances;  Existing or potential barriers to trade have been identified;  Measurement/test methods for these specified regulated dangerous substances have already been developed and are used on a national or EU level. Considering point (a) in the “Grounds” for the Mandate it is stated that products “at risk” from technical barriers to trade are equally important to existing barriers to trade, and also in the above Clause 7, Execution of the Mandate, the second dash refers to “potential barriers” as well as established barriers. This makes the scope of the work wider than simply identifying existing technical barriers. The Mandate also specifically refers to ‘technical’ barriers to trade, and CEN is especially asked to consider in the Work Package the following TR: “Work Package 1: technical reports: procedures for testing and testing schemes 1. Technical Report on examples of existing and potential barriers to trade in relation with emission of regulated dangerous substances into indoor air, surface water, ground water or soil.

Construction products — Assessment of release of dangerous substances — Barriers to trade

BS PD CEN/TR 15858:2009 建筑产品.基于WT、WFT/FT程序的对建筑产品的受管制危险物质的释放的评估

This CEN Technical Report describes a procedure for assessing construction products with regards to their release/emission of regulated dangerous substances (RDS) into the environment in accordance with Essential Requirement Number 3 of the Construction Products Directive (CPD), as far as these construction products fall under the responsibility of CEN. NOTE 1 For the purpose of this document and mandate M/366, the release of regulated dangerous substances from construction products is limited to two main environmental compartments: 1) soil, groundwater and surface water; 2) indoor air. NOTE 2 It should be noted that construction products falling under the CPD and these environmental compartments are the subject of other European Union regulations, e.g. REACH, and they may also be the subject of Member State regulations. This Technical Report defines how the mandated characteristics expressed in terms of mandated RDSs for each construction product can be assessed by an individual manufacturer using the ‘Without Testing’ (WT) procedure and/or the ‘Without Further Testing’ (WFT) and ‘Further Testing’ (FT) procedures after an initial type assessment and how the corresponding information accompanying the CE marking can be expressed in terms of declared values or RDS classes. This report describes: a) under which conditions a RDS class for a construction product may be declared by the individual manufacturer using the ‘Without Testing (WT)’ assessment procedure; b) if all relevant mandated RDSs are assessed by this Without Testing procedure, how a set of RDS classes for a construction product may also be declared by the manufacturer without the need for testing of their specific products; c) how to establish RDS classes for a construction product using a Without Further Testing procedure once sufficient information has been obtained from initial type testing; d) when and how to undertake Further Testing as part of factory production control; e) how to evaluate conformity of the construction product to one or more RDS classes; f) how to create and declare a set of RDS classes using one or a combination of the WT, WFT and FT procedures. For construction products that have to be tested, horizontal European release/emission test methods are the reference methods, but this report also describes under which conditions screening tests may be used. The use of alternative tests is part of the standard CPD procedure and therefore the use of alternative tests is not described in this report. NOTE A manufacturer is free to use an alternative test calibrated against the reference method. However, data based on the reference method has precedence if there is conflicting information. The procedures described in this CEN Technical Report are intended to be applied for placing products on the market; it includes the 'no performance determined' option (NPD) for application where compliance to a regulation related to ER 3 of the CPD is not required. This report does not cover European Technical Approvals. This CEN Technical Report is limited to the scope of the CPD and mandate M/366. Consequently, release/emission during the construction and end-of-life phases are not covered.

Construction products — Assessment of the release of regulated dangerous substances from construction products based on the WT, WFT/FT procedures

ASTM C1699-09 用压板测定多孔建筑材料持水曲线的试验方法

The purpose of this test is to obtain, by means of a specified laboratory procedure, the values of the equilibrium moisture content at higher RH levels ((≈ 95 to 100%). These values are used either as means to characterize the material or as material characteristics needed as input to appropriate computer models that can simulate wetting or drying potential of individual building materials or material assemblies under specified environmental conditions.1.1 This test method specifies a laboratory procedure for the determination of the water retention curve (or moisture storage capacity) of porous building materials at very high relative humidity (RH) levels (≈ 95 to 100% RH) corresponding to the capillary moisture region of the sorption isotherm. This is achieved by using the pressure plate test apparatus. This technique was originally developed to study soil moisture content and eventually had been adapted to building construction materials. 1.2 At higher RH levels (≈ 95 to 100% RH) of the sorption isotherm (see Test Method C 1498), use of climatic chamber is not an option. This technique uses overpressure to extract water out of the pore structure of porous materials until equilibrium between the moisture content in the specimens and the corresponding overpressure is achieved. Using the pressure plate extractors, equilibrium can only be reached by desorption. 1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Moisture Retention Curves of Porous Building Materials Using Pressure Plates

ASTM C802-09a 为确定建筑材料试验方法精确度而实行实验室间试验程序的标准实施规程

Certain criteria need to be met before undertaking an interlaboratory study to determine the precision of a test method. It is not necessary that all of the following conditions described be completely fulfilled in every case; however, if some conditions are not met or are met incompletely, the program will become more complicated and require more work and expense, or may result in impaired information. The recommendations outlined in this section are intended to ensure that the test method is free of technical difficulties to the greatest extent possible before an expensive and time-consuming interlaboratory study is undertaken. The first requirement is the existence of a valid and well-written test method that has been developed in one competent laboratory (or by cooperative work in a small number of laboratories), and has been subjected to a screening procedure, or to ruggedness testing as described in Practice C1067. As a result of the screening procedure and some experience with the test method in the sponsoring laboratory and one or two others, a written version of the test method has been developed (but not necessarily published as a standard method) that describes the test procedure in terms that can easily be followed in any properly equipped laboratory. Conditions that affect the test results should be identified and the proper degree of control of those conditions should be specified in the description of the test procedure (see Note 1). Note 18212;The desired degree of control of conditions that affect test results may not always be practically achievable, and tolerances in the test method should recognize this fact. Variations in test results due to variations in such conditions contribute to the total variation which determines the precision of the test method. If the resulting variation is so great that uncertainties in average values obtained by the test method are unacceptably high, then the test method itself is at fault, and efforts should be made to improve it or to replace it by a better one. An expensive and time-consuming interlaboratory study should not be undertaken on such a test method. Any apparatus required for performing the test should be appropriately designed and available at reasonable cost. Personnel in participating laboratories should have enough experience with the test method so that they are competent to run the test. The importance of this requirement will vary with the complexity of the method and the degree to which it departs from familiar procedures. Preliminary knowledge should exist about how changes in materials and conditions affect the test results. There should be a reasonable degree of certainty that the within-laboratory variances are the same in different laboratories, and that troublesome interactions do not exist. These conditions are investigated in the analysis of the data of an interlaboratory study, and are discussed further in 8.2.2, 8.2.3, and Appendix X1. Facilities and procedures for procurement, preparation, and distribution of samples must be available and should be as simple and free of difficulties as practicable. Selection of samples must be done by a randomization process, and one person who is familiar with randomization procedures should be responsible for seeing that the procedure is carried out. Refer to Recommended Practice E105. Adequate numbers of participating laboratories, operators, and materials must be available. Requirements in these areas are specified in Sections 4 and 5. The entire interlaboratory test program should be developed from the beginning with the help and advice of persons familiar with statistical procedures and with the mate.......

Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Test Program to Determine the Precision of Test Methods for Construction Materials

KS L ISO 13788:2008 建筑部件和构件的湿热性能.能避免临界表面湿度和缝隙冷凝作用的内表面温度.计算方法

이 표준은 다음 사항에 대한 계산법을 규정한다.a) 곰팡이가 번식할 수 있는 건물 부재

Hygrothermal performance of building components and building elements-Internal surface temperature to avoid critical surface humidity and interstitial condensation-Calculation methods

SS EN 934-6-2008 混凝土、灰泥和水泥浆用掺合料规范.第6部分:取样、合格控制,与合格评定

This Singapore Standard specifies procedures for sampling, conformity control and evaluation of conformity, for admixtures according to the series SS EN 934.

Specification for Admixtures for concrete,mortar and grout - Part 6: Sampling, conformity control and evaluation of conformity

SS EN 934-4-2008 混凝土、灰泥和水泥浆用掺合料规范.预应力钢筋束用灌浆掺合料.第4部分:混凝土掺合料.定义、要求、合格,标志和标签

This Singapore Standard defines and specifies requirements and conformity criteria for admixtures for the use in grouts for prestressing tendons according to EN 447. It covers admixtures for use in site mixed grout only. Provisions for the use of grout admixtures are not part of this standard but are covered by EN 447.

Specification for Admixtures for concrete,mortar and grout -Admixtures for grout for prestressing tendons - Part 4: Definitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling