Q10 建材产品综合 标准查询与下载

JC/T 2177-2013 硅藻泥装饰壁材

本标准规定了硅藻泥装饰壁材的术语和定义、要求、试验方法、检验规则以及标志、包装、运输和贮存等。本标准适用于含有硅藻材料的干粉状内墙装饰涂覆材料。

Diatomaceous decorative interior wall materials

JIS A 1435:2013 建筑物外壁材料的耐霜冻性冻融法试验方法

This Standard specifies the testing method for the resistance to freezing and thawing action of the inorganic materials manufactured in plate form in a factory among the materials used for the exterior of buildings (hereafter referred to as "exterior materials").

Method of test for resistance of exterior materials of buildings to freezing and thawing

BS EN 13956:2012 防水柔性板材. 屋顶防水用塑料和橡胶板. 特征和定义

Flexible sheets for waterproofing. Plastic and rubber sheets for roof waterproofing. Definitions and characteristics

ISO 13788:2012 建筑部件和构件的湿热性能.能避免临界表面湿度和缝隙冷凝作用的内表面温度.计算方法

This International Standard gives simplified calculation methods for: a) The internal surface temperature of a building component or building element below which mould growth is likely, given the internal temperature and relative humidity. The method can also be used to assess the risk of other internal surface condensation problems. b) The assessment of the risk of interstitial condensation due to water vapour diffusion. The method used does not take account of a number of important physical phenomena including: — the variation of material properties with moisture content; — capillary suction and liquid moisture transfer within materials; — air movement from within the building into the component through gaps or within air spaces; — the hygroscopic moisture capacity of materials. c) Consequently, the method is applicable only where the effects of these phenomena can be considered to be negligible. The time taken for water, from any source, in a layer between two high vapour resistance layers to dry out and the risk of interstitial condensation occurring elsewhere in the component during the drying process.

Hygrothermal performance of building components and building elements - Internal surface temperature to avoid critical surface humidity and interstitial condensation - Calculation methods

KS F 1527-2012 资源循环型建筑材料管理术语

이 표준은 자원 순환형 건축자재1)에 관계되는 용어에 대하여 규정한다.

Terminology related to resource recycling building materials

DB41/ 725-2012 烧结非黏土多孔砖

Sintered non-clay porous brick

WB/T 1013-2012 玻镁复合保温屋面板

本标准规定了玻镁复合保温屋面板的分类、要求、试验方法、检验规则和标志、使用说明书、堆放与运输。 本标准适用于以钢筋混凝土用热轧光圆钢筋或热轧带肋钢筋经防腐处理后作受力筋，以氧化镁(MgO)、氯化镁（MgCl)和水（H0)三元体系，经配改性剂改性而制成的性能稳定的镁质水泥为胶凝材料，以中碱或无碱玻璃纤维网布为增强材料，与聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料板或硬质岩棉板或发泡水泥作芯材复合而成的玻镁复合保温屋面板；本标准适用于公共建筑，工业厂房;大型仓库等一般工业与民用建筑。

Glass fiber reinforced and magnesium oxy-chloride gelatinous materials composite heat-shielded roof panel

UL BUILDING MATERIALS-2012 建筑材料目录

Building Materials Directory

ASTM C1067-12 建筑材料试验方法用重现性评估或筛选程序的标准实施规程

The purpose of a ruggedness evaluation, or screening program, is to determine the sensitivity of the test method to changes in levels of pertinent operating factors using a small number of tests. Normally, operating conditions for a test method are defined along with allowable tolerances. A ruggedness analysis determines the effect of “worst-case” variation in operating conditions within the specified tolerances. If the ruggedness evaluation indicates high variation (poor precision), the method can be revised with smaller tolerances on operating conditions to improve the precision. This practice evaluates the effects of seven factors using eight treatments. The disadvantage of this approach is that it only estimates the main effects of the factors and does not detect the effects of interactions among factors. For this reason, this is a screening program and additional investigation is required to investigate whether there are interaction effects. A major reason for poor precision in test methods is the lack of adequate control over the sources of variation in testing procedures or testing environments. These sources of variation often are not controlled adequately because they were not identified during the development of the test procedures as having a large effect on the determinations. This practice provides a systematic procedure to establish the required degree of control for different testing parameters. All new test methods must be subjected to an interlaboratory program to develop a precision and bias statement. These programs can be expensive and lengthy, and the result may show that the method is too variable and should not be published without further revision. Interlaboratory studies may give the subcommittee an indication that the method is too variable, but they do not usually give a clear picture of the causes of the variation. Application of this practice using one or two laboratories before finalizing the test method and conducting the interlaboratory study is an economical way to determine these causes. Many existing test methods were developed before there was a requirement for precision and bias statements. Since this became a requirement, most of these test methods have developed precision and bias statements, and the result is that many have been found to suffer from relatively large amount of variation. This practice provides a relatively simple and economical way to investigate the causes of variation in test methods, so that a subcommittee will have some guidance as to which parts of the test method need to be revised. The procedure can be used for a screening program within a single laboratory, but involvement of at least three laboratories is recommended, particularly if the single laboratory were to be the one that developed the test method. This is particularly important for new test methods. The originating laboratory is so much a part of the development of the test method that it is difficult for it to be objective in spotting any problems in the clarity of the test method directions. Two additional laboratories will probably contribute fresh critical review of the validity of the test method and provide assistance in clarifying the instructions of the test method when needed. This practice, however, is not intended to provide information on multilaboratory precision, but it does provide some information on single-operator precision, which could be used to develop a temporary repeatability statement until the interlaboratory study is completed.1.1 This practice covers a procedure for evaluating the ruggedness of a test method by determining the effects of different experimental factors on the variation of test results. The procedure is intended for use during the development of a test method before the interlaboratory study is executed, such as those described in ......

Standard Practice for Conducting a Ruggedness Evaluation or Screening Program for Test Methods for Construction Materials

ASTM D3665-12 建筑材料的随机采样的标准实施规程

This practice is useful for determining the location or time, or both, to take a sample in order to minimize any unintentional bias on the part of the person taking the sample. Note 18212;The effectiveness of this practice in achieving random samples is limited only by the conscientiousness of the user in following the stipulated procedures. The selection procedures and examples in this standard provide a practical approach for ensuring that construction material samples are obtained in a random manner. Additional details concerning the number of sample increments, the number of samples, the quantities of material in each, and the procedures for extracting sample increments or samples from the construction lot or process are contained in Practices C172, C183, D75, D140, D979, D5361, and Test Method D345. This standard contains examples citing road and paving materials. The concepts outlined herein are applicable to the random sampling of any construction material and can easily be adapted thereto. Additional sampling guidance is provided in Practice E105 concerning probability sampling, Practice E122 concerning choosing sample sizes to estimate the average quality of a lot or process (see Note 2), and in Practice E141 for acceptance of evidence based on results of probability sampling. Note 28212;The guidance contained in Practice E122 is not available in other documents referenced in this section. The best and most practical method for ensuring that samples of construction materials include the full range of a construction process is by incorporating a stratified-random sampling procedure into the sampling process. To implement a stratified-random sampling procedure, divide the lot to be sampled into the desired number of equal sublots and randomly sample each sublot in accordance with this standard. Note 38212;If the sublots are of unequal size, it will likely be necessary to weight the samples in order to maintain a fair and defensible sampling process. TABLE 1 Table of Random Numbers Column Row12345678

Standard Practice for Random Sampling of Construction Materials

JG/T 338-2011 建筑玻璃用隔热涂料

本标准规定了建筑玻璃用隔热涂料的术语和定义、分类和标记、要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输和贮存。 本标准适用于以合成树脂或合成树脂乳液为基料，与功能性颜填料及各种助剂配制而成的，施涂于建筑玻璃表面的透明的隔热涂料。其他玻璃表面用的隔热涂料可参照本标准执行。

Thermal insulation coatings for building glass

JG/T 335-2011 混凝土结构防护用成膜型涂料

本标准规定了混凝土结构防护用成膜型涂料的术语和定义、分类和标记、要求、试验方法、检验规则以及标志、包装、运输和贮存。 本标准适用于混凝土结构防护用成膜型涂料。

Film-forming coatings for concrete structure protection

JG/T 337-2011 混凝土结构防护用渗透型涂料

本标准规定了混凝土结构防护用渗透型涂料的术语和定义、分类和标记、要求、试验方法、检验规则 以及标志、包装、运输和贮存。 本标准适用于混凝土结构防护用渗透型涂料。

Agents of surface coating for protection of concrete structures

DB13/T 1457-2011 建筑模板组合支撑系统

本标准规定了新型建筑模板组合支撑系统的范围、术语与定义、分类、技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志与运输。 本标准适用于建筑工程混凝土浇筑施工中使用的模板支撑系统。

Building formwork combination support system

UL 2779-2011 抑尘剂

Dust suppressants

CJ/T 371-2011 垃圾填埋场用高密度聚乙烯管材

本标准规定了垃圾填埋场用聚乙烯(PE)管材的术语和定义、材料、要求、试验方法、检验规则和标志、包装、运输和贮存。 本标准适用于垃圾填埋场的填埋气体、渗沥液、地下水及地表水的收集和输送用高密度聚乙烯管材。

High density polyethylenepipes for landfields

UL BUILDING MATERIALS-2011 建筑材料目录

Building Materials Directory

ASTM E329-11b 施工检验,测试或专项检验从业机构执业标准规格

The testing and inspection of construction and the materials in construction is an important element in obtaining quality construction in general compliance to the contract documents. A construction inspection, Special Inspection or testing agency, or both, must be selected with care after a comprehensive evaluation of their competency to perform the services properly and in compliance with the applicable building code. This specification provides basic minimum criteria for use in evaluating the qualifications of technically oriented construction inspection, Special Inspection, or testing agency. The criteria may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements for particular classes of testing or types of inspection agencies. An individual user can also use it to judge the competency of an agency. The intent of this specification is to provide a consensus system standardized basis for requirements for a technically oriented construction inspection, Special Inspection, or testing agency, with respect to the agency''s capability to objectively and competently provide the specific services without prejudice. Typically, assessing an agency involves the following three essential sequential phases: Submittal of basic information in accordance with the criteria of this specification to the evaluator by an agency desiring to be qualified to this specification, Assessing the agency-submitted information from the accreditation body, and On-site assessment of the agency by the accreditation body.1.1 This specification defines the minimum requirements for inspection agency personnel or testing agency laboratory personnel engaged in: a. Construction Inspection of construction and materials used in construction. b. Special Inspection of construction and materials used in construction. c. Testing of materials used in construction. 1.2 Criteria is provided for evaluating the competence of an agency to properly perform designated tests, inspections, or Special Inspection services, and establishes essential characteristics pertaining to the organization, management, personnel, facilities, quality systems, responsibilities, duties, test and inspection methods, records, and reports of the agency. This specification may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements if required. 1.2.1 This specification specifically addresses factors relevant to an agency’s ability to produce precise, accurate test data or determine the conformity of construction and materials used in construction with regulations, codes, standards, or specifications containing the requirements against which the test or inspection will be performed, or both. Specific or general requirements include: 1.2.1.1 Technical competency of staff, 1.2.1.2 Validity and appropriateness of test and inspection methods and procedures, 1.2.1.3 Traceability of measurements and calibrations to national standards, 1.2.1.4 Suitability, calibration, and maintenance of test equipment, 1.2.1.5 Sampling, handling, and transportation of test items, 1.2.1.6 Quality assurance of test and inspection data, 1.2.1.7 Reporting of test and inspection data or findings, and 1.2.1.8 Non Conformance Report (NCR) management and records. 1.3 This specification can be used as a basis to evaluate an agency and is intended for use in qualifying or accrediting, or both, agencies, public or private, engaged in the testing of materials and Construction or Special inspection of construction and materials used in construction. These inspection services include but are not limited to reinforced concrete, precast concrete......

Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in Construction Inspection, Testing, or Special Inspection

ASTM E329-11c 建筑用材料的检验,测试或专项检查机构的标准规格

The testing and inspection of construction and the materials in construction is an important element in obtaining quality construction in general compliance to the contract documents. An agency providing construction inspection, Special Inspection, or testing must be selected with care after a comprehensive evaluation of their competency to perform the services properly and in compliance with the applicable building code. This specification provides basic minimum criteria for use in evaluating the qualifications of technically oriented construction inspection, Special Inspection, or testing agency. The criteria may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements for particular classes of testing or types of inspection agencies. An individual user can also use it to judge the competency of an agency. The intent of this specification is to provide a consensus system standardized basis for requirements for a technically oriented construction inspection, Special Inspection, or testing agency, with respect to the agency's capability to objectively and competently provide the specific services without prejudice. Typically, assessing an agency involves the following three essential sequential phases: Submittal of basic information in accordance with the criteria of this specification to the evaluator by an agency desiring to be qualified to this specification, Assessing the agency-submitted information from the accreditation body, and On-site assessment of the agency by the accreditation body.1.1 This specification defines the minimum requirements for inspection agency personnel or testing agencies engaged in: a. Construction inspection of construction and materials used in construction, b. Special Inspection, and c. Testing of construction and materials used in construction. 1.2 Criteria are provided for evaluating the competence of an agency to properly perform designated tests, inspections, or Special Inspection services. This specification establishes essential characteristics pertaining to the organization, management, personnel, facilities, quality systems, responsibilities, duties, test and inspection methods, records, and reports of the agency. This specification may be supplemented by more specific criteria and requirements if required. 1.2.1 This specification specifically addresses factors relevant to an agency’s ability to produce precise, accurate test data or determine the conformity of construction and materials used in construction with regulations, codes, standards, or specifications containing the requirements against which the test or inspection will be performed, or both. Specific or general requirements include: 1.2.1.1 Technical competency of personnel, 1.2.1.2 Validity and appropriateness of test and inspection methods and procedures, 1.2.1.3 Traceability of measurements and calibrations to national standards, 1.2.1.4 Suitability, calibration, and maintenance of test equipment, 1.2.1.5 Sampling, handling, and transportation of test items, 1.2.1.6 Quality assurance of test and inspection data, 1.2.1.7 Reporting of test and inspection data or findings, and 1.2.1.8 Non Conformance Report (NCR) management and records. 1.3 This specification can be used as a basis to assess an agency and is intended for use in accrediting agencies, public or private, engaged in construction inspection. Special Inspection or testing of construction and materials used in construction. These inspection services include but are not limited to reinforced concrete, precast concrete, structural steel erection, welding, bolting, soil and rock, foun......

Standard Specification for Agencies Engaged in Construction Inspection, Testing, or Special Inspection

ASTM C1363-11 用高温实验室法测定建筑材料和包装组件热性能的标准试验方法

A need exists for accurate data on heat transfer through insulated structures at representative test conditions. The data are needed to judge compliance with specifications and regulations, for design guidance, for research evaluations of the effect of changes in materials or constructions, and for verification of, or use in, simulation models. Other ASTM standards such as Test Methods C177 and C518 provide data on homogeneous specimens bounded by temperature controlled flat impervious plates. The hot box test method is more suitable for providing such data for large building elements, usually of a built-up or composite nature, which are exposed to temperature-controlled air on both sides. For the results to be representative of a building construction, only representative sections shall be tested. The test specimen shall duplicate the framing geometry, material composition and installation practice, and orientation of construction (see Section 7). This test method does not establish test conditions, specimen configuration, or data acquisition details but leaves these choices to be made in a manner consistent with the specific application being considered. Data obtained by the use of this test method is representative of the specimen performance only for the conditions of the test. It is unlikely that the test conditions will exactly duplicate in-use conditions and the user of the test results must be cautioned of possible significant differences. For example, in some specimens, especially those containing empty cavities or cavities open to one surface, the overall resistance or transmittance will depend upon the temperature difference across the test specimen due to internal convection. Detailed heat flow analysis shall precede the use of the hot box apparatus for large, complex structures. A structure that contains cavity spaces between adjacent surfaces, for example, an attic section including a ceiling with sloping roof, may be difficult to test properly. Consideration must be given to the effects of specimen size, natural air movement, ventilation effects, radiative effects, and baffles at the guard/meter interface when designing the test specimen. For vertical specimens with air spaces that significantly affect thermal performance, the metering chamber dimension shall match the effective construction height. If this is not possible, horizontal convection barriers shall be installed inside the specimen air cavities at the metering chamber boundaries to prevent air exchange between the metering and guarding areas. The operator shall note in the report any use of convection barriers. The report shall contain a warning stating that the use of the barriers might modify the heat transfer through the system causing significant errors. For ceiling tests with low density insulations, the minimum lateral dimension of the specimen shall be at least several times the dimension of the expected convection cells. Since this test method is used to determine the total heat flow through the test area demarcated by the metering box, it is possible to determine the heat flow through a building element smaller than the test area, such as a window or representative area of a panel unit, if the parallel heat flow through the remaining surrounding area is independently determined. See Annex A8 for the general method. Discussion of all special conditions used during the test shall be included in the test report (see Section 13).1.1 This test method establishes the principles for the design of a hot box apparatus and the minimum requirements for the determination of the steady state thermal performance of building assemblies when exposed to controlled laboratory conditions. This method is also used to......

Standard Test Method for Thermal Performance of Building Materials and Envelope Assemblies by Means of a Hot Box Apparatus